shadowpwner

41 ms·

31.
by shadowpwner 16y ago
What's the incentive for people to contribute? It seems that it'll quickly turn into something like Associated Content.
32.
by shadowpwner 16y ago
This is OT, but does anyone know the link to the blog posts about reviewing computer science? I've used google and searchyc without any luck.
33.
by shadowpwner 16y ago
Wow, I missed that completely. Tags: april fool joke, behavioral targeting, joke, lol, sophisticated
34.
by shadowpwner 16y ago
Interesting how this happens on the same day of World Backup day. ( http://blog.reddit.com/2011/03/better-have-backup-plan-world... )
35.
by shadowpwner 16y ago
The ten test subjects is hardly a representative sample.
36.
by shadowpwner 16y ago
Wow, that's a really profound statement for me. Mind blown, thanks to you, dear sir.
37.
by shadowpwner 16y ago
Random, but is the intro from the "Stuff You Should Know" podcast?
38.
by shadowpwner 16y ago
I found it odd too, I assumed it was used humorously.
39.
by shadowpwner 16y ago
What's interesting is how Microsoft had "Street view"-esque technology, except they made further innovations to allow not only a straight path, but a 360 walk around view. It was released to the public in 2008, its a shame they didn't attem
40.
by shadowpwner 16y ago
Yes, but major development is still needed to make such reactors safe and viable.
41.
by shadowpwner 16y ago
> Wrong type of power. I don't think you explained this. It seems as though you're just arguing about the cost of batteries, not a certain "type" of power. (what types of power are there, anyways? I only know of one: electricity. There
42.
by shadowpwner 16y ago
I know, but if they were linked to anonymous, wouldn't they want anonymity?
43.
by shadowpwner 16y ago
These look amazing, but they're just parabolic plastic, with presumably less-than-nice sound quality.
44.
by shadowpwner 16y ago
See the reddit link up above. I don't see anything wrong with the email nope@gmail.com.
45.
by shadowpwner 16y ago
Hardly, but without some background or sources I'd say a majority of people wouldn't know where you're coming from.
46.
by shadowpwner 16y ago
> Firefox 4 without loosing Tags It's right there. Also most people look down on url shortners, because it's a great way to hide spam.
47.
by shadowpwner 16y ago
Personally, I wouldn't buy your product based on your ad because it looks like your product is a flimsy plastic sheet someone can make by unwrapping a plastic bag. I remember reading about this on Reddit, how were sales there? Also, have yo
48.
by shadowpwner 16y ago
Wow.. I wonder what extent the animations stay the same after the conversion. Can anyone throw up a before and after?
49.
by shadowpwner 16y ago
No it won't, but its just a quick hack.
50.
by shadowpwner 16y ago
I probably should have explained it. The newer logo is a little darker, more pronounced bevel, and darker/less spread out shadow.
51.
by shadowpwner 16y ago
This can be done really easily in userscripts (accepted in Chrome too). content-area a:visited {display:none;} Actual coding left as an exercise to the reader.
52.
Anyone notice the changes to the Google logo?
3 points by shadowpwner 16y ago|2 comments
53.
by shadowpwner 16y ago
Oh, the power and beauty of the pentatonic scale.
54.
by shadowpwner 16y ago
Yup, I'm sure it's in the blogger's rights to republish his own articles with a more link-baity title.
55.
by shadowpwner 16y ago
His website works for me.
56.
by shadowpwner 16y ago
You can always disregard robots.txt.. ;)
57.
by shadowpwner 16y ago
Yes please.
58.
by shadowpwner 16y ago
It's beautiful.
59.
by shadowpwner 16y ago
Thanks for the clarification, not too sure why you were downvoted.
60.
by shadowpwner 16y ago
This is beautiful, and I'm a photography buff, but how does this have anything to do with startups or hacking?

More ›