Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
sgt101
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
34 ms
·
721.
▲
by
sgt101
3y ago
Yes, massive cross subsidies from core business to cloud business to exclude and destroy competition - aws=books, azure=windows, gcp=search. There are three companies doing monopolistic things, they have got away with it because of that plu
722.
▲
by
sgt101
3y ago
A 2022 macbook pro
723.
▲
UK AI policy exposed at House of Lord's committee
(parliamentlive.tv)
1 points
by
sgt101
3y ago
|
0 comments
724.
▲
by
sgt101
3y ago
Several things struck me: first no real presaging of social media, but instead a view of personalised and interactive "media". Maybe this is what we are now transitioning to with the apparent collapse of twitter and facebook? I th
725.
▲
by
sgt101
3y ago
honestly, what sort of internal model of ML and AI do people who write blogs lik e this have?
726.
▲
by
sgt101
3y ago
Do you think that these images were in the GPT4 training set? maybe...
727.
▲
by
sgt101
3y ago
I think it all depends who you believe about how batteries will develop and the consequences of manufacturing them. On the other hand from what I understand fusion isn't all that clean itself. The problem is that it's impossible t
728.
▲
by
sgt101
3y ago
I think globalisation is very much reversable and in fact is being reversed at a rate of knots by things like Biden's green deal
729.
▲
Cancer microbiom paper results questioned in new publication
(twitter.com)
1 points
by
sgt101
3y ago
|
1 comments
730.
▲
by
sgt101
3y ago
Interesting about the inflation here. In 1931 mean wages in the UK are reckoned to have been 1s (£0.05) per hour [1]. Currently mean wages in the UK are £617 per week (40hrs) or £15.42 per hour [2]. So a half sov in 1931 was worth 10hrs of
731.
▲
by
sgt101
3y ago
it's only statistically improbable to get 7 sons (in a row) if you have all couples that create 7 children have a 50/50 chance of son/daughter. If you have a reason why a couple will only produce sons (genetics) then it beco
732.
▲
by
sgt101
3y ago
Business isn't just about managing costs.
733.
▲
by
sgt101
3y ago
On prem requires a capital investment and a cast iron workload prediction. If you have a stable business this works. But you may still want to go to cloud if IT is not your business. An on prem infrastructure requires capital and capital ca
734.
▲
by
sgt101
3y ago
Would we think of it differently if we called it LLC - large language correlation?
735.
▲
by
sgt101
3y ago
“I am risk-neutral on overall impact.” isn't this a way of saying "I don't give a *@!# about any of you"? EA couched as nihilism. Nowhere in this do I find the question of "what if he/I/we are wrong?"
736.
▲
by
sgt101
3y ago
If you lie with dogs, you wake up with fleas.
737.
▲
by
sgt101
3y ago
>The birthplace of masonry .. the worlds oldest, longest-running university .. its oldest commons .. Pardon my ignorance - what separates this from other sites like Lascaux?
738.
▲
by
sgt101
3y ago
Yup - if you are thinking about what the story was in about 1978... Since then there's been a big change from the idea cities were the only locus of culture and technology to a view that nomadic peoples were able to create significant
739.
▲
by
sgt101
3y ago
Everything is decided with violence one way or another.
740.
▲
by
sgt101
3y ago
I can do this on my laptop /tumbleweed...
741.
▲
by
sgt101
3y ago
9/10 requests for a simple sql query get a working query. This isn't enough to enable a useful interface. It takes a lot of scaffolding to get an llm powered interface to actually work.
742.
▲
by
sgt101
3y ago
interesting that they went for a pipes based metaphor rather than a scratch like jigsaw
743.
▲
by
sgt101
3y ago
this is a good point - but transitory I think
744.
▲
by
sgt101
3y ago
financial competition.
745.
▲
by
sgt101
3y ago
As soon as the accommodation strategy needs a refresh this changes. If you can reduce the office footprint you can save money. Bringing people in often means increasing the footprint post wfh. Wfh will win where it actually succeeds becau
746.
▲
by
sgt101
3y ago
Not really - strange things that are poorly documented are often hard to explain. The things that are well recorded and documented all get explained rather quickly.
747.
▲
by
sgt101
3y ago
I think we can see where different complex animals split in their evolutionary tree - so humans and starfish split a long way back. Then we use a standard mutation clock to estimate how long ago that was. If all complex animals split from s
748.
▲
by
sgt101
3y ago
Gosh - imagine that place! I wonder how old this world is, and how stable its enviroment is/has been. Complex animal life took 3.5 bn years to emerge on Earth, of course that's a meaningless data point by itself but intuitively fo
749.
▲
by
sgt101
3y ago
There are different levels of argument depending on the precision of the definition of the concepts in play, which is unhelpful in general but also unavoidable. I think that the folk definition of computation is so wide and vague that almos
750.
▲
by
sgt101
3y ago
Well - I don't bet mate. I've seen too many people ruin themselves doing it. I really suggest that you think very carefully about making bets at those odds as well as it often (about 9 times out of 10?) ends badly. Unless you have
More ›