sfoskett

8 ms·

1. 31.▲
   by sfoskett 10y ago

   Crap. I missed that. You're right.
2. 32.▲
   by sfoskett 10y ago

   The point is that due to the much better backward compatibility and do-it-all nature of USB Type-C, consumers are much more likely to run into incompatible devices and cables than ever before. Walk into any store and you'll see dozens
3. 33.▲
   by sfoskett 10y ago

   Well the USB IF does have standard naming and labels for the protocols. The issue is that USB Type-C is a cable/port standard, not a protocol standard. Makers ought to label the USB Type-C port with the highest USB speed it can handle
4. 34.▲
   Total Nightmare: USB-C and Thunderbolt 3(blog.fosketts.net)

   814 points by sfoskett 10y ago|446 comments
5. 35.▲
   How we filter information about IT products(ethancbanks.com)

   1 points by sfoskett 12y ago|0 comments
6. 36.▲
   Why is DataGravity Such a Big Deal?(blog.fosketts.net)

   1 points by sfoskett 12y ago|0 comments
7. 37.▲
   by sfoskett 15y ago

   If ReFS is really in the Server version of 8, and if it really doesn't support sparse files, consider the implication of built-in deduplication. It does sparse files at a layer above the filesystem, along with dedupe and compression. Or, as
8. 38.▲
   Introducing SDXC and exFAT in Apple Mac OS X(blog.fosketts.net)

   2 points by sfoskett 16y ago|0 comments
9. 39.▲
   How Fast Is It? A Storage Infographic – Stephen Foskett, Pack Rat(blog.fosketts.net)

   1 points by sfoskett 16y ago|0 comments
10. 40.▲
    Storage Tiering vs Caching(techvirtuoso.com)

    1 points by sfoskett 16y ago|0 comments