setopt

6 ms·

31.
by setopt 1mo ago
> have learned them over the years Well I guess that’s the difference? I personally change themes many times per day depending on my mood and the lighting conditions, and probably go through at least a few dozen themes in a year. I don’t
32.
by setopt 1mo ago
> I’ll stick with my local LLM that’s slow but handles my simple requests from time to time. Sounds like a worthy partner.
33.
by setopt 1mo ago
The issue at hand isn’t people using AI to make some app that they and their mom will use. That’s awesome. It’s people who insist that potentially millions of other people should be affected by their vibe-coded stuff too, by upstreaming it
34.
by setopt 1mo ago
Are you using the 31 release or prerelease? The mode was changed to experimental right before release. Just FYI, I think the comment you replied to is by the author of the mode and an upstream Emacs contributor, so I would assume their inst
35.
by setopt 1mo ago
Well, yeah. I also wouldn’t like to explain to my family why my emoji is more important than being set for life.
36.
by setopt 1mo ago
Given that most measures of intelligence follow nearly normal distributions (as long as you stay away from the tails), I think it doesn’t matter that much.
37.
by setopt 1mo ago
"Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that." — George Carlin
38.
by setopt 1mo ago
Sounds better to do postprocess filtering explicitly? For example, adding random noise with amplitude 1/255 (which should be as invisible as the watermark), followed by a smart blur that blurs more in directions where the colors are mo
39.
by setopt 1mo ago
So any mail to anyrandomstring@yourdomain.com is actually received? Sounds like something that works great when only you do it, but might quickly be abused if it catches on?
40.
by setopt 1mo ago
> But the consistent trend of the last couple decades (arguably since Turing's time) seems to be that any time a computer reaches our definition of intelligence we decide that that was a flawed definition I do recall a couple of dec
41.
by setopt 2mo ago
> instead of even trying to provide feature parity, they basically dumped all that responsibility onto the WM/DE devs. In other words, the Wayland people should perhaps have defined official protocol extensions early on to cover mos
42.
by setopt 2mo ago
> You generally can’t apply functions to dimensional units. The only thing units can do is be multiplied or divided together. So I can multiply a mass by a distance or divide a distance by a speed, and I can multiply the result by a scal
43.
by setopt 2mo ago
Very exciting. Closed source was one of the main things making me not try it out yet. Any good resources for getting started? And anything on doing NumPy/SciPy-like stuff in it?
44.
by setopt 2mo ago
There might be a market for a USB-C camera to take phone screen photos to immediately upload back into the phone.
45.
by setopt 2mo ago
According to the rules, accepting or refusing cookies should be equally difficult. Making them both difficult makes people not use your site, so the incentive should be to make both options easy if you follow the rules. Malicious compliance
46.
by setopt 2mo ago
As a non-American, I don’t even understand today what that means. (And the website linked to isn’t loading, so I don’t have the context from that.)
47.
by setopt 2mo ago
I think you misunderstand my point. The ancestral post to this thread is pointing out that a normal worker in 1963 -- with probably just one income -- could support 5 children while owning 2 houses and 3 apartments. Then someone argues, mor
48.
by setopt 2mo ago
It really isn’t though. The median person in 1963 didn’t need say internet or computers or smartphones, because no one expected them to have one. Good luck even applying for a job today without at least a computer and internet, and possibly
49.
by setopt 2mo ago
I believe Haskell did that for decades before C++.
50.
by setopt 2mo ago
No one claimed that people just "love popping abortion pills". At least my reading of their comment is that these pills are considered dangerous to take alone in your bedroom, without monitoring and follow-up by health professiona
51.
by setopt 2mo ago
Not sure why you’re getting downvoted. The explanation sounds very reasonable.
52.
by setopt 2mo ago
Sounds very appealing. Anyone here have experience with it? If I want to try it, should I go print or digital? How is the writing compared to say The Economist or other more mainstream options?
53.
by setopt 2mo ago
> There are a few of these "maintainer said no AI pulls, so we forked it" in the wild already and I am really interested to see how it all pans out. There are also forks that go in the other direction, i.e. forking to avoid AI
54.
by setopt 2mo ago
n’th’ed?
55.
by setopt 2mo ago
I haven’t followed the news. Sounds like IBM is bad news for Fedora long term?
56.
by setopt 2mo ago
Indeed, I did switch to a rubber-like PenTips nib after that, and it made the writing experience really silent. Unfortunately it also felt somehow clumsy to write with – worse than just plastic-on-glass writing. It’s hard to describe, but i
57.
by setopt 2mo ago
Interesting. I wonder what’s the difference in our usage, perhaps the amount of force we normally use when swiping and writing? Regarding noise, one of the main reasons I stopped using it was because my partner complained about the «scratc
58.
by setopt 2mo ago
Paperlike is indeed nice for handwriting, but it has drawbacks. The increased friction makes it uncomfortable to use your fingers to navigate the iPad for long, and since it makes the finger motion along the screen less smooth, it sometimes
59.
by setopt 2mo ago
Which the parent poster said in their comment?
60.
by setopt 3mo ago
In what way? Do you have concrete examples?

More ›