ses1984

9 ms·

1. 151.▲
   by ses1984 10mo ago

   That's the point.
2. 152.▲
   by ses1984 11mo ago

   It’s fine about 80% of the time, but the other 20% is a lot harder to answer because of lower quality results.
3. 153.▲
   by ses1984 11mo ago

   I still don’t understand the significance of the distinction, maybe because we are talking about caffeine in particular. Caffeine alters mood and causes euphoria. Is that not a chemical component of addiction? What’s the significance of the
4. 154.▲
   by ses1984 11mo ago

   What’s the point of this distinction, what does it mean that it’s not chemically addictive? It causes withdrawals, dependence, it definitely acts on brain chemistry.
5. 155.▲
   by ses1984 11mo ago

   There is one particularly convenient fact of having ten digits.
6. 156.▲
   by ses1984 11mo ago

   I feel like most high throughput distributed systems eventually reach a point where some part of it is constrained by de/serialization. Not much is faster than protobuf except for zero copy formats.
7. 157.▲
   by ses1984 11mo ago

   We are mincing words. I don’t think collaboration, altruism, and other pro social traits are exclusive of instrumentalizing. Whatever word you want to use that encompasses pro social behaviors, let’s use that word if you don’t like instrume
8. 158.▲
   by ses1984 11mo ago

   Isn’t aiming to be authentic a form of “instrumentalizing”?
9. 159.▲
   by ses1984 1y ago

   I don’t want my phone to consume any of my “free” attention, ever, but holy cow especially not while driving.
10. 160.▲
    by ses1984 1y ago

    Let’s say for a minute these are drug or terrorist boats. Wouldn’t it be in the US best interest to capture these, gather proof, gather further intel? I’m not making an outrageous claim. They are making outrageous claims and destroying the
11. 161.▲
    by ses1984 1y ago

    They know it’s fishermen, they just don’t care.
12. 162.▲
    by ses1984 1y ago

    You might be right, but does anyone have data to support that hypothesis?
13. 163.▲
    by ses1984 1y ago

    I was generalizing to more sites than just reddit. Mostly I see a ton of ai slop that pollutes google search results, you’ll see an intro paragraph that looks vaguely coherent, but the more you scroll, the more apparent you’re reading ai sl
14. 164.▲
    by ses1984 1y ago

    Well based on the amount of shit I dig out even if I floss after, and it’s effect on my breath, ima keep doing it.
15. 165.▲
    by ses1984 1y ago

    At least you get to prompt the llm, as opposed to consuming content where you don’t know what the prompt was and could have been intended to misinform. At least the response doesn’t have an ad injected between each paragraph and is intentio
16. 166.▲
    by ses1984 1y ago

    > Observing someone’s behavior in Vegas is a just looking at a proxy for wealth, not the actual wealth.
17. 167.▲
    by ses1984 1y ago

    I’m sorry but I feel you missed the point. Couldn’t someone else just give him a bunch of cash to blow on the test, to spoil the result? Couldn’t he give away his last dollar but pretend he’s just going to another casino? Observing someone’
18. 168.▲
    by ses1984 1y ago

    Did you pay for that AI to work for you? How much would you be willing to pay for it? Tractors undoubtedly increase farmer efficiency, the evidence is clear to see, even when accounting for all costs necessary to design and produce tractors
19. 169.▲
    by ses1984 1y ago

    I’m sorry but big tech doesn’t get the benefit of the doubt.
20. 170.▲
    by ses1984 1y ago

    This is extremely out of touch. Don’t you remember post 9/11 war mongering? Jingoistic country songs? Was the Supreme Court not almost fully captured in the early 2020s? Was the majority of news media on television and radio not extrem
21. 171.▲
    by ses1984 1y ago

    Any limitation on their right to merger should be spelled out in a law passed by congress and not from pressure from an executive appointee.
22. 172.▲
    by ses1984 1y ago

    Have you not read the news that abc was pressured by the fcc wrt a pending merger? Isn’t that the federal govt “abridging the freedom of the press” ?
23. 173.▲
    by ses1984 1y ago

    If you can see it you can also almost safely assume it’s broken in some way.
24. 174.▲
    by ses1984 1y ago

    I tried to find sources to verify and it wasn’t as easy as I thought. I just assumed that shielding your components from EMI would shield them from voltage spikes due to EMI. It does shield you from bit flips due to EMI. https://
25. 175.▲
    by ses1984 1y ago

    There’s more to it than that. It’s better for the longevity of the components to be shielded, and the noise it gives iff could bother you in your home, in terms of wifi, Bluetooth, etc interference. I practice electric guitar at home and I
26. 176.▲
    by ses1984 1y ago

    It’s more likely to be quieter than a fan.
27. 177.▲
    by ses1984 1y ago

    You don’t think most huge decisions are discussed over back channels in addition to or before moving to official channels?
28. 178.▲
    by ses1984 1y ago

    The idea that models are transformative is debatable. Works with copyright are the thing that imbues the model with value. If that statement isn’t true, then they can just exclude those works and nothing is lost, right? Also, half the probl
29. 179.▲
    by ses1984 1y ago

    The part that I don’t see is how this is actually a significant causal factor driving families out.
30. 180.▲
    by ses1984 1y ago

    If you had a source for those claims, it might be interesting.