seru

4 ms·

1.
by seru 3y ago
Ahh, you want to kill some content, aye? Lets see, which hatchet will work best - can't immediately find flaws in the logic, so that one's out; same deal with the math. Let's look broader - let's just say, ah, this conte
2.
by seru 3y ago
Take care - Poe's law applies to voting and civic engagement suppression tactics as well (of which this is a prime example.)
3.
by seru 3y ago
Subject: Concerns Regarding the FAA Exemption Request by Boeing for the 737 MAX Aircraft [YOUR NAME] [YOUR ADDRESS] [DATE] [REPRESENTATIVE NAME] [REPRESENTATIVE OFFICE ADDRESS] Dear [REPRESENTATIVE/SENATOR] [REPRESENTATIVE LAST NAME],
4.
by seru 3y ago
"since Meta had no way of auditing 3rd party apps on the user's phone" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Onavo
5.
by seru 3y ago
Glad to see the precommitments here. Archive link to improve credibility of such since HN comments can be edited - I see multiple others in the past day as well: https://web.archive.org/web/20230810111519/https:&#x
6.
by seru 3y ago
Past outcomes created by a known actor's engagement with similar projects may be predictive of their objectives with regards to this instance of engagement.
7.
by seru 3y ago
Primary sources for this article appear to primarily be a 2014 cochrane review and 2008 article; the journalism looks to be mostly just asking a family doc a few questions - low quality.
8.
by seru 4y ago
You communicate using assertions and vocabulary that positively connotates acquiescence to employer demands and very-nearly implies that such acquiescence is the only reasonable course of action. This is an approach that is typically used t