Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
serioussecurity
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
31.
▲
by
serioussecurity
5y ago
This definitely violates the terms of service, if that's what you're asking.
32.
▲
by
serioussecurity
5y ago
Tesla is 5 years behind and has no plans to begin work on a number of the key challenges they're facing.
33.
▲
by
serioussecurity
5y ago
Microsoft didn't run automatic code analysis tools as part of their code review process until 2017? What on earth was wrong?
34.
▲
by
serioussecurity
6y ago
It's been a big deal for hundreds of years, most notably in economics and the military. Any reasonable company worth their salt was doing "data science" in the 1950s but calling it statistics or logistics or business intellig
35.
▲
by
serioussecurity
6y ago
Search handles probably an order of magnitude more changes per second than GMail+Docs combined
36.
▲
by
serioussecurity
6y ago
I've seen individual engineers make a mistake that caused 100 engineer's salary worth of damage.
37.
▲
by
serioussecurity
6y ago
That's quite often illegal, unfortunately.
38.
▲
by
serioussecurity
6y ago
You don't get to use retaliatory behavior to discourage lawsuits, in this form, especially as a service provider. If they wanted to sue Epic back over frivolous patent violations, they're allowed, but if you're going to engag
39.
▲
by
serioussecurity
7y ago
Yes and no. They run on the same hardware and share a lot of the internal tools. Which is a very big lift.
40.
▲
by
serioussecurity
7y ago
this abjectly fails to deal with heteroscedasticity
41.
▲
by
serioussecurity
7y ago
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-019-1540-5
42.
▲
by
serioussecurity
7y ago
Uber / Lyft
43.
▲
by
serioussecurity
7y ago
No one stopped Uber, no one has stopped Tesla (Tesla hasn't been able deal with regression testing on a lane finding system...)
44.
▲
by
serioussecurity
7y ago
If they know there's a high probability they'll be hit they'll adapt their behavior. The uncertainty of whether or not you're painted is significant.
45.
▲
by
serioussecurity
7y ago
Most fire is suppressing fire. If you could have the equivalent of suppressing fire without needing to waste bullets that'd be a huge change.
46.
▲
by
serioussecurity
7y ago
Most of my interesting papers have resulted from letting go of my "logical" brain and letting my emotions play with the problem until a line of attack opens, then I turn on the logic brain to get it done.
47.
▲
by
serioussecurity
7y ago
As I get older I understand the systems better but I get lazier. Give me 20 people and I will blow your mind, but on my own I get very little done. Part of why I manage people is I know what to do but can't actually do it myself (emot
48.
▲
by
serioussecurity
7y ago
We don't even know what fraction of what we term consciousness or intelligence comes from the brain. Antonio Damasio is a good read.
49.
▲
by
serioussecurity
7y ago
Mehhhh. BERT is mind blowing, Waymo has started fully driverless service.
50.
▲
by
serioussecurity
7y ago
Sweep a physical occluder across the lens, measure abatement?
51.
▲
by
serioussecurity
7y ago
Back testing however is possible. You could collect all recorded data from all driverless orgs, and require any new deploy be run over it. Plus a simulation. For example, creating a standards body that collected this data and certified and
52.
▲
by
serioussecurity
7y ago
Tell me more.
53.
▲
by
serioussecurity
7y ago
Does that hold when they're actively working to harm you and yours?
54.
▲
by
serioussecurity
7y ago
Ipcc report
55.
▲
by
serioussecurity
7y ago
NLP systems don't "just fail". https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/01/10/508363607...
56.
▲
by
serioussecurity
7y ago
Epstein would use his connection to these institutions as cover with peers, and as a way to find clients. There's evidence this includes Marvin Minsky.
57.
▲
by
serioussecurity
7y ago
Do Not Use This With Your Own Money. Literally millions of people have already trod this path, the low-hanging fruit in finance is already picked, and in many other contexts as well. The big mistake people new to the field make is to reason
58.
▲
by
serioussecurity
7y ago
This piece is a bit unsettling, most notably for it's being being barely coherent in structure, picking out seemingly random observations and facts. The observations and facts all would fit nicely into an effort to cast Mann's int
59.
▲
by
serioussecurity
7y ago
Everyone here seems to think that if you have a good job you shouldn't be involved in labor organizing, because everyone else has it worse? Isn't the point that everyone should be organizing because working conditions everywhere a
60.
▲
by
serioussecurity
7y ago
Density in this case referring to "kW per acre of solar panels", and the #s come out to something like covering all of Australia with solar panels, if I remember correctly.
More ›