Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
sergioj97
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
12 ms
·
31.
▲
by
sergioj97
7y ago
I agree it's not worth the hate, but in my opinion SI units are much more convenient. Using your own example, miles vs kilometers may not feel like a big difference, but the fact that you have proportional units (mm, cm, m, km) for any
32.
▲
by
sergioj97
7y ago
> Do you assert that the prevailing or overwhelming opinion was in favour of one particular position? Can you provide evidence for that? I think like he's arguing exactly the opposite, as he's implied multiple times: > The c
33.
▲
by
sergioj97
7y ago
Even though it seems clear that the checklist itself has to be well designed, I don't think it's a bad idea to ensure they are followed. Strategies like the one the OP proposed are independent from checklist quality.
34.
▲
by
sergioj97
7y ago
Things like this make me wonder: is it really worth for the airlines (I'm also talking about plane manufacturers here) to be this secure? I would assume it's not different from the automotive industry, where the security of your p
35.
▲
by
sergioj97
7y ago
It doesn't seem reasonable to me to evaluate if a law is necessary by checking how enforceable it is. Even if a crime is hard to fight, I think that's a problem but not an excuse. And if the problem is the police singling out some
36.
▲
by
sergioj97
7y ago
Even though I don't think the car analogy is a good one, I understand that just the fact that something can harm you doesn't make it inherently bad or unethical to use. You have enough control of your car to not kill yourself (or
37.
▲
by
sergioj97
7y ago
> "Because psychedelic is at least at present a useful form of social control" Why significantly more so than alcohol?
38.
▲
by
sergioj97
7y ago
Different tools have differences though. And some tools harm people more easily than others, independently of the person who uses them. I don't understand why alcohol has such an important place in some cultures and I find disturbing t
39.
▲
by
sergioj97
7y ago
I'm not Chilean but my girlfriend is, and I thought of that word instantly when I saw this. Even though I'm not Chilean, I'm from Spain and I think I have a decent grasp on its meaning. It can be used to refer to any person o
40.
▲
by
sergioj97
7y ago
Even though I think that wouldn't persuade the protesters, it's an interesting point to make.
41.
▲
by
sergioj97
7y ago
Why does it require more time than any other sport such as basketball?
42.
▲
by
sergioj97
7y ago
What I understood is just that reflect seems to fit better here, given the most common use cases for the word.
43.
▲
by
sergioj97
7y ago
I don't think there's a way to know for sure. I guess we could exchange links that described opposite points of view all day long, but we wouldn't reach any meaningful conclusions. However I fail to understand why this human
44.
▲
by
sergioj97
7y ago
Why do you assume these UFOs reached the Earth in a "reasonable" amount of time? The possibility that they were roaming the space for hundreds or even thousands of years before reaching our planet is as reasonable as any other. Ev
45.
▲
by
sergioj97
7y ago
No reason to believe the UFOs reached the Earth in a "reasonable" amount of time, though. There are many other interesting possibilities.
46.
▲
by
sergioj97
7y ago
Are you just asking for a software capable of playing the right notes from a written piece?
47.
▲
by
sergioj97
7y ago
Even though you can't visualize his face, can you just describe it?
48.
▲
by
sergioj97
7y ago
I can't fully understand the nature of this condition. Can you visualize faces? I assume you can't, but I guess you will be able to, say, describe someone's face without having him/her standing right in front of you, am
49.
▲
by
sergioj97
8y ago
IMO this is also true for grappling martial arts, specifically Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu. Removing strikes and focusing on ground grappling makes a wonderful substrate for a thoughtful martial art. You have plenty of time to think what you are go
50.
▲
by
sergioj97
8y ago
> Cats are know to play with their preys when satiated keeping them alive as long as possible. When they do, it doesn't look like what the leopard was doing with the calf. They don't "play" in that sense, they just in
51.
▲
by
sergioj97
8y ago
I assume you mean acknowledging the different credibility of different sources, instead of just not believing anything at all. It's just as with the academia thing. I don't think the solution is to dismiss formal research and cons
52.
▲
by
sergioj97
8y ago
She gave her opinion, but what she received wasn't another opinion, it was a reckless siege against his husband's business. I don't think I understand what your point is. It's not symmetrical at all.
53.
▲
by
sergioj97
8y ago
I don't think he has said it was irrelevant. He said it was no argument for not banning them.
54.
▲
by
sergioj97
8y ago
That's much easier to do if you develop a mobile turret from the beginning. The idea is that there are technologies which are fairly harder to use offensively than others.
55.
▲
by
sergioj97
8y ago
Is it? It's a complementary opinion, but a rather obvious one. I think the main reason why a reader may just dismiss that point of view is that the article simply doesn't give enough information about that (the relation with his p
56.
▲
by
sergioj97
8y ago
I think the encryption thing was more about Facebook not being able to intercept your messages, read/store them, and remain unnoticed. Of course they can "still" read your messages as they could rewrite the app in a few subtl
57.
▲
by
sergioj97
8y ago
That's the same I thought. I don't think I fully understand this article.
58.
▲
by
sergioj97
8y ago
Isn't English compulsory almost everywhere throughout the EU? I live in Madrid and it definitely is here in Spain. It's true, however, that the fact that every TV show is completely dubbed makes it harder for us to develop our spe
59.
▲
by
sergioj97
8y ago
I can't see how any of that advantages would result in a duller experience.
60.
▲
by
sergioj97
8y ago
I can't understand and I would like to. Could you explain yourself?
More ›