4 ms·
> Do you assert that the prevailing or overwhelming opinion was in favour of one particular position? Can you provide evidence for that? I think like he's argu
by sergioj97 7y ago
> Do you assert that the prevailing or overwhelming opinion was in favour of one particular position? Can you provide evidence for that?
I think like he's arguing exactly the opposite, as he's implied multiple times:
> The challenge is the low bar of whether or not a topic has an overwhelming majority of opinion.
> But I'm asking why the person posting believes that the HN community overwhelmingly believes X and their evidence for that.
- tomhoward 7y agoIf they are of the view that there was no clearly prevailing position on that topic, then we're in consensus and we're all done with the discussion :) >> But I'm asking why the person posting believes that the HN community overwhelmingly believes X and their evidence for that. My read on it is that the person wasn't making an assertion of fact on this, they were making a wry observation that their perception of a prevailing view was the opposite of their parent commenter's perception of a prevailing view, thus demonstrating the hostile media effect in action.