Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
selridge
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
151.
▲
by
selridge
8mo ago
"Scott is not suing" For what?
152.
▲
by
selridge
8mo ago
I just think everyone who says they don't like magic should be forced to give an extemporaneous explanation of paging.
153.
▲
by
selridge
8mo ago
Yeah. Lots of busywork where if you had to assign it to a human you would need to find someone with deep technical expertise plus inordinate, unflagging attention to detail. You couldn’t pass it off to a batch of summer interns. It would ha
154.
▲
by
selridge
8mo ago
I sincerely doubt you produced the source where he asked that question in the middle of someone else’s job talk. Which is what I was referring to. I read what you wrote, pal. Did you read what I wrote?
155.
▲
by
selridge
8mo ago
I do t see either of those as the premise. This is about getting the computer to do the stuff we had been promised computing would make easier, stuff that was never capital-H Hard but just annoying. Most of the real claw skills are people c
156.
▲
by
selridge
8mo ago
Got a weird one https://github.com/Protonk/PAWL
157.
▲
by
selridge
8mo ago
Yeah, it was Quinn. I didn’t want to name them and seem too knowing haha.
158.
▲
by
selridge
8mo ago
This blog post could have just been an email.
159.
▲
by
selridge
8mo ago
This content was from a year ago and was not written by AI.
160.
▲
by
selridge
8mo ago
Do we know that engine is not Turing-complete for sure?
161.
▲
by
selridge
8mo ago
That’s not true. Lots of apple’s own first party apps use SBPL to sandbox because the entitlement granularity doesn’t cut it. There’s also lots of apps on the MAS which use temporary-exception SBPL to fully sandbox. I agree that there is no
162.
▲
by
selridge
8mo ago
There’s not that much detail. A few comments in 2019 from a DTS person indicated that Apple didn’t really anticipate people shipping on this in volume. My guess is they want to dissuade people from using it. They can’t immediately just do a
163.
▲
by
selridge
8mo ago
Oh I like this. Taste couldn’t be transitive into software before but now it can.
164.
▲
by
selridge
8mo ago
You don’t understand the allure of having a computer actually do stuff for you instead of being a place where you receive email and get yelled at by a linter?
165.
▲
by
selridge
8mo ago
What a new an interesting viewpoint which has the ability to change as the evidence does!
166.
▲
by
selridge
8mo ago
Still deprecated. Still in use by everyone.
167.
▲
by
selridge
8mo ago
Claude, Firefox, safari, chrome, etc etc etc etc Basically everyone who has to care about security on the Mac.
168.
▲
by
selridge
8mo ago
Why is it on hacker news? That’s the implied question. It’s an issue on a piece of software. There’s more than 10,000 of them. Why is it news?
169.
▲
by
selridge
8mo ago
>no one should be debugging He literally said those exact words out loud from the audience during a job talk. And yeah, the total aim and the reason why he might just blurt that out is because a lot of the frustration and esprit de corps
170.
▲
by
selridge
8mo ago
I really don't think we're living in a "linearly interpolate from past behavior" kinda situation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.14928 Just read some of that. It's not long. This IS NOT the past te
171.
▲
by
selridge
8mo ago
...there's...evidence of excessive token usage by Claude Code. Yeah. What's the 'news'?
172.
▲
by
selridge
8mo ago
This is just a github issue with a vague complaint.
173.
▲
by
selridge
8mo ago
Naw.
174.
▲
by
selridge
8mo ago
I can't reply to the other comment, but here goes: This is one (1) conversation: https://chatgpt.com/share/69991d7e-87fc-8002-8c0e-2b38ed6673... It has 9 "prompts" On just the issue of path re-writing, t
175.
▲
by
selridge
8mo ago
Don't treat chat as anything other than ephemeral. That's the only workaround.
176.
▲
by
selridge
8mo ago
Don't treat chat as a contracted space. It's inhalation and exhaust. Store things you care about on disk!
177.
▲
by
selridge
8mo ago
No the same question CANNOT be asked of source code because it can execute. You might as well ask for a record of the conversations between two engineers while code was being written. That's what the chat is. I have a pre-pre-alpha pro
178.
▲
by
selridge
8mo ago
This is delightful. Accidental load-bearing SO post.
179.
▲
by
selridge
8mo ago
You didn't read it, how would you know?
180.
▲
by
selridge
8mo ago
Dijkstra also said no one should be debugging and yet here we are. He's not wrong about the problems of natural language YET HERE ARE. That would, I think, cause a sensible engineer to start poking at the predicate instead of announcin
More ›