Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
selkin
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
61.
▲
by
selkin
1y ago
If they don't care, why should you? They found a deal that seems to be ok for them. To get them to change providers, you need to suggest one that would be a better value, and to be honest, I don't think you can find one.
62.
▲
by
selkin
1y ago
Tell me you haven't run a large email server without telling me. There's a reason even large corporates that can easily afford the resources to run email their email themselves decide against it. There are a handful of good provid
63.
▲
by
selkin
1y ago
Even when they don't, it doesn't matter. Email wasn't designed for privacy or security, and can't accommodate those. Lucky for us, we now have much better tools for those use cases, so we don't need to clumsily try
64.
▲
by
selkin
1y ago
It can be summarized that the romanticized ideal of Email is long gone, if it ever existed. Today email is a way for others, mostly automations, to send you notifications. Once you realize this, the "just keep whatever I have right now
65.
▲
by
selkin
1y ago
> The problem with email is that everything is transmitted in plain text. That's not a Gmail problem, and no reason to migrate. Some use cases just don't fit email, and for those, we have other, more fitting platforms. > So,
66.
▲
by
selkin
1y ago
You don't need his level of skill to open a car door (you attack the latching mechanism, not the barrel itself).
67.
▲
by
selkin
1y ago
It's not ease, it's efficiency: opening a locked car door is 1-2 minutes for an experienced person. Smashing the window is 2 seconds (though you also need some experience, as modern car side windows are also laminated).
68.
▲
by
selkin
1y ago
Being outside the US doesn’t shield you from it. And worse, it is harder for the American government to eavesdrop on US soil than it is outside America. Of course, if a national spying apparatus is after you, regardless of the nation, prett
69.
▲
by
selkin
1y ago
Your ideas on nationality are 200+ years out of date. Yet shoving and pushing you into the modern world isn’t something for randos on the internet to do, but on yourself. Good luck!
70.
▲
by
selkin
1y ago
You must’ve slept through both civics and history classes. The 14th amendment to the US constitution grants unconditional (and thus, irrevocable) citizenship jos soli. Naturalization indeed is mandated by the nationality law and not the co
71.
▲
by
selkin
1y ago
Emma Lazarus would beg to differ.
72.
▲
by
selkin
1y ago
H1B is also for fashion models, which AFAIK, do not need their employer to prove they can not hire an American person for the role before being granted permission to hire a temporary foreign employee.
73.
▲
by
selkin
1y ago
Modern keyfobs keep listening and transmitting all the time, as you no longer need to push a button. Just get close enough to the car and it opens.
74.
▲
by
selkin
1y ago
Only this isn’t a submarine, as it operates at surface and doesn’t dive. This is semi-submersible. When built right, it’s hard to detect from a boat. I guess the goal of automation here is like it always is: remove the cost of human labor.
75.
▲
by
selkin
1y ago
It seems to work on macOS 15 as well, with some limitations[0]. [0] https://github.com/apple/container/blob/main/docs/technical-...
76.
▲
by
selkin
1y ago
It looks like nothing here is new: we have all the building blocks already. What Apple done is packaged it all nicely, which is nothing to discount: there's a reason people buy managed services over just raw metal for hosting their ser
77.
▲
by
selkin
1y ago
Podman Desktop, and probably other Linux-containers on macOS tools, can already create multiple VMs, each hosting a subset of the containers you run on your Mac. What seems to be different here, is that a VM per each container is the defaul
78.
▲
by
selkin
1y ago
This doesn't look like WSL1. They're not running Linux syscalls to the macOS kernel, but running Linux in a VM, more like the WSL2[0] approach. [0] https://devblogs.microsoft.com/commandline/announcing-wsl-2&#
79.
▲
by
selkin
1y ago
There were many more than four in total. Right now they have more then four (there are completely separate messaging apps hidden inside Docs and Maps). It is easy to confuse them all, considering those apps got renamed often. By my count, t
80.
▲
by
selkin
1y ago
It's exactly the same reason: gram referenced a known quantity. Changing it by a few insignificant digits because of the kilogram update wouldn't force people to realign their perception of it. Changing it to ~1,000 times what it
81.
▲
by
selkin
1y ago
For the same reason it was not renamed "Wug".
82.
▲
by
selkin
1y ago
> Good concurrency should make the code simpler to understand and reason about as it grows. As an ideal. But you can only go so simple once you have a piece of data that is read at the same time by many, while also maybe mutated by at le
83.
▲
by
selkin
1y ago
I think I wasn't clear about the point I was trying to make, because your comment seems unrelated to it. Pre-metrification there wasn't a French unit system, like we think about those today, where a meter in Paris is the same mete
84.
▲
by
selkin
1y ago
It’s an historical artifact, as it was easier to manufacture a reference kilogram than a reference gram. Considering today we set the kilogram by fixing the Planck constant and deriving it from there, we can just divide each side of the def
85.
▲
by
selkin
1y ago
The pre-metric measurements in France weren’t imperial, but local: units had the same name, but different cities defined them differently. A livre[0] in one village was almost, but not quite, the livre used by the one only a couple toise[1
86.
▲
by
selkin
1y ago
“The Measure of All Things” by Ken Adler[0] is a good, extremely readable book about their adventure, which was indeed wild. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/978-0-349-...
87.
▲
by
selkin
1y ago
> Initially, I avoided Swift because of my previous experience with it […] without native async/await at that time, writing concurrent code compared to Go or JS/TS felt clunky and boilerplate-heavy. I have to disagree. Async ma
88.
▲
by
selkin
1y ago
s/they’d let/would have let/ According to a recent interview[0], the president has an uncontrolled phone (maybe in addition to other, approved devices). [0] https://archive.ph/2025.05.07-050707/https:
89.
▲
by
selkin
1y ago
Last year Shopify was named as a customer[0], which I found both surprising and not. [0] https://blocksandfiles.com/2024/07/04/oxide-ships-first-clou...
90.
▲
by
selkin
1y ago
Final is an access modifier. It controls who can change a value (in this case, no one). And like other access modifiers, you can use reflection to remove or change those modifier. It is a security barrier the developer asks the system to up
More ›