sek

54 ms·

451.
by sek 15y ago
The reason there was competition between VCs, this is a different motivation and the amount is not that high.
452.
by sek 15y ago
It also takes a lot of pressure from you and maybe distracts from building the company. On Wallstreet they call this "fuck you money".
453.
by sek 15y ago
A founder who believes in his business, will never cash out early. period. He would always get more after an IPO or exit. So why would he? I assume the founders are not stupid, they know their valuation is not justified.
454.
by sek 15y ago
I thought these people just exist on TBBT.
455.
by sek 15y ago
Facebook message content: Forever. Sad to compare this to Telecoms.
456.
by sek 15y ago
The financial crisis killed this project for Porsche, but the background is very difficult. In financial terms this didn't matter. The funny thing in this whole Story was Ferdinand Piech, he has full control over VW as head of the board and
457.
by sek 15y ago
> I found that, with all services (from aim to slashdot to facebook to HN) that people who claim to spend 5 minutes really end up spending about an hour a day. How did you found that? I don't have to track that, i am there just some sec
458.
by sek 15y ago
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luddite_fallacy
459.
by sek 15y ago
Well i don't expect them to do it instantly, but just "never" deleting anything is what bugs me. There is no necessity to change backups, just to remove it from the current database and when the last backup is outdated it is gone. You can't
460.
by sek 15y ago
Unbelievable: http://europe-v-facebook.org/EN/Data_Pool/data_pool.html They delete sh*t, if you delete your posts they don't remove them from their databases. This makes me really angry, there is a reason why i delete this stuff. I can't
461.
by sek 15y ago
When they don't save it there is nothing to get. They have a policy to remove personal data after 3 months or so.
462.
by sek 15y ago
I mean that their behavior has side effects, not the violation.
463.
by sek 15y ago
Maybe this will educate Users, the reality is that these actions have side effects already. They track you everywhere you go with cookies and create a profile of your surfing behavior. The Facebook like button is so wide spread and they kno
464.
by sek 15y ago
This is exactly my behavior. If i need a little distraction i go to Reddit or Google+.
465.
by sek 15y ago
Same experience, i think they delete nothing at all.
466.
by sek 15y ago
With all this inflation, not so impressive.
467.
by sek 15y ago
I don't understand what they want? Who asked for this text wall? To be honest, 99% of the time i just check for new messages or use the chat and don't care about anything else. There may be a lot of people who care about this stuff, but how
468.
by sek 15y ago
That is the big announcement on the Developer conference? A little disappointing. This will be moderately successful, because all the People will put it next to their like button. The Like button is used because people like to give active s
469.
by sek 15y ago
Who has the time to read all that stuff?
470.
by sek 15y ago
The same situation with Jerome Kerviel, he did this for a long time and nobody complained as long as he made Money.
471.
by sek 15y ago
AOL is the best example and they are in the same market. IBM, Apple without Jobs and i think Microsoft's stock correlates also to these indicators. The economic theory behind this is very good explained in this TED talk: http://www.ted.com
472.
by sek 15y ago
They are scared and this is the motivator for their decisions. A company can't act like that, this will lead to a downward spiral. This is a common behavior of companies who are over their peak. There is a record of companies who tried to b
473.
by sek 15y ago
There is a lot of sensationalist PR from IBM. The Cat Brain, the Smarter Planet thing, the AI processor and now a 1k times faster processor..... some arbitrary stuff an nothing concrete. I wonder what this PR strategy should accomplish and
474.
by sek 15y ago
I wonder if they couldn't, what if Google took the offer back after they saw their financials.
475.
by sek 15y ago
Again a misleading Headline for klicks. The subject was an injunction, i don't know how the author comes to the conclusion of a permanent ban. This is just a prequel to the real trial.
476.
by sek 15y ago
Look at your comments, you have some bias against Microsoft and Google.
477.
by sek 15y ago
What a genius move, that is only reason for this domain. No porn provider will use this, because it will be banned on so many places. It didn't make any sense, but now it does. Super expensive and you don't want your company reputation to b
478.
by sek 15y ago
The reason is the peering, the traffic volume of Youtube is not profitable without peering infrastructure.
479.
by sek 15y ago
Why? Are you aware that the only reason for Youtube's success the infrastructure of Google is? This is also the only reason why there is no real competitor.
480.
by sek 15y ago
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:bwunp13...

More ›