Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
seehafer
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
15 ms
·
121.
▲
by
seehafer
9y ago
Right, what I meant was, if someone wanted to see your video, they'd either need to ask you or be an investor invited by YC.
122.
▲
by
seehafer
9y ago
Yeah, you either need to be an investor or make friends with one of the founders and ask really nice
123.
▲
by
seehafer
9y ago
Unfortunately, ALT is not a solution, because it's not accepted by FDA, except as a temporary measure. Any drug submission that supports shelf life via ALT data will be expected to also say "and we're doing real time testing
124.
▲
by
seehafer
9y ago
Interesting, I get ~28fps on Safari w/o measurable increase in CPU utilization On a brand new MBP, though. Maybe that has an effect.
125.
▲
by
seehafer
9y ago
LA fixed that by taking Sierra water https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Los_Angeles_Aqueduct Vegas relies on the Colorado River, which is very overtaxed for what it supports now (Vegas + Phoenix)
126.
▲
by
seehafer
9y ago
Having tried the "Contact the City Council of a city I don't live in" thing in the past, I'd suggest a better use of your time, if you don't live in Brisbane or MV, is to try to find companies that do and persuade t
127.
▲
by
seehafer
9y ago
Why, hello, Theranos employee and/or Tim Draper.
128.
▲
by
seehafer
9y ago
> I really hate the miniseries. Same here. A good case for why a more a faithful adaptation doesn't make for a better product. You believe in the world Lynch creates. The miniseries, by contrast, is so fake looking and fake feelin
129.
▲
by
seehafer
10y ago
Lack of empathy for the customer is the big thing that has led me to fire developers in the past
130.
▲
by
seehafer
10y ago
"One person familiar with the matter said Theranos now has about $150 million or less in cash, excluding the ($40 million) debt" You can run a company for quite a while on $110M, even in Silicon Valley.
131.
▲
by
seehafer
10y ago
Late stage investors evidently think they're pot committed.
132.
▲
by
seehafer
10y ago
Sounds like this is similar to vpc ( https://cloud.google.com/virtual-network/ ). Am I missing something?
133.
▲
by
seehafer
10y ago
Please relay back to your team that the moment you get Postgres for your Cloud SQL product you'll get a lot of AWS converts.
134.
▲
by
seehafer
10y ago
You've described a system wherein waiting lists are pervasive. Why do you think it's working? (This doesn't imply I think the American system is working. On the contrary, I think it's a mess.)
135.
▲
by
seehafer
10y ago
They weren't banned by FDA, they were banned by CMS. And the ban was on conducting tests only. They're still allowed to develop test equipment to sell to other companies that will actually perform the tests. But the scrutiny they
136.
▲
by
seehafer
10y ago
There is: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Master_of_Studies_in_Law
137.
▲
by
seehafer
10y ago
Theranos is a giant middle finger to everyone in the industry who acts honestly and really has the best interest of patients at heart.
138.
▲
by
seehafer
10y ago
A note to anyone who ever works for a CLIA or FDA regulated company: disclosing that a company is falsifying test data is NOT violation of a trade secret and in most cases a company that takes action against you for doing so is in violation
139.
▲
by
seehafer
10y ago
Incorrect. They did submit to FDA review. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&c... They were actively testing people in Arizona for at least several months. Definitely NOT in "
140.
▲
by
seehafer
10y ago
> The other part: FDA is controlled by the companies that come under its umbrella. Think of the fox guarding the hen house. People who work at companies that come under its umbrella wish that were true. It's not. There is a revolvin
141.
▲
by
seehafer
10y ago
> Maybe we worked in different fields? Class III devices (pacemakers, deep brain stimulators, insulin pumps) > Did the FDA actually check your software or just your documentation? In a submission, occasionally. In an audit, it depende
142.
▲
by
seehafer
10y ago
As someone who has been on the receiving end of several FDA audits, I would really like to know on what basis you're saying all of this, because everything in my 10 years of experience of doing this is contrary to what you've said
143.
▲
by
seehafer
10y ago
"Progressive" in SF == "f#$* you, I've got mine already".
144.
▲
by
seehafer
10y ago
Would love to hear the opinions of founders who hated this practice as employees now they're on the other side of the table. Personally I've always had a strict salary/comp band in place for each position, but having never ha
145.
▲
by
seehafer
10y ago
No, the regulatory system is actually doing its job. The regulatory system is predicated on the government not being all knowing and all seeing and private actors in the industry having a bit of sense and doing their own due diligence. To s
146.
▲
by
seehafer
10y ago
Donald is a test as to whether or not you can win an election on white votes. The rich, white, male votes are probably the one cohort of whites he's least likely to get.
147.
▲
by
seehafer
10y ago
My guess -- some nasty implicit or explicit "you talk to the press and we'll sue you into oblivion" agreements that employees had to sign. Which you and I know are especially illegal in the life science industries at the fede
148.
▲
by
seehafer
10y ago
> It seems to me the big chunk of the problem is that my local hospital doesn't really have to compete with anyone and has rather free reign in setting prices. Yes, there is definitely lack of competition at the provider level which
149.
▲
by
seehafer
10y ago
This is particularly important in healthcare, as this type of barrier to entry is a key contributor to rising healthcare costs.
150.
▲
by
seehafer
10y ago
This would be me. @koji, I think this is fantastic, as my startup's mission is precisely to demystify the process of getting (and maintaining) regulatory clearance/approval. Would love to connect. Just reached out over email.
More ›