Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
sebringj
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
26 ms
·
241.
▲
by
sebringj
8y ago
I remember random recruiters talking me into speaking with 4 blockchain companies for remote gigs. I had a hard time understanding the value proposition and asked the founders types of questions like, why is this knowledge base better than
242.
▲
by
sebringj
8y ago
thanks i should have looked into this more seems
243.
▲
by
sebringj
8y ago
The article mentions ubiquitous micro satellites. This tech is simply following from that although not directly stated in the title. The fact that these micro satellites are cheap and so easy to cookie cutter and deploy is great in terms of
244.
▲
by
sebringj
8y ago
This is cool but now I'm more concerned in learning how launching micro satellites has become so easy for the masses which would be my opposite reaction normally. Meaning this is not without bad side effects. I watched "in a nutsh
245.
▲
by
sebringj
8y ago
It was interesting to note about workers and using web assembly together within V8 as this scenario could bypass the need for complexity and memory overhead, while combining different programming languages on the server-side. Not that it co
246.
▲
by
sebringj
8y ago
Maybe a different paradigm to blogging would be bring your own cloud, put in your cloud creds, then it does the beauty work for you in publishing static stuff to those cloud providers like AWS S3. You just pay a minimal fee to use it ad hoc
247.
▲
by
sebringj
8y ago
Yah that's why I use the serializable override: someObj.toJSON = function() { return { foo: this.foo, bar: this.bar } } It is an extra step but when using redux or something like that you have to serialize stuff anyway to store it an
248.
▲
by
sebringj
8y ago
The Gates Foundation focuses on real problems and how they can be implemented in the real world to actually solve things that work with the environment, economy and culture symbiotically as opposed to paying for porta-potties and drop shipp
249.
▲
by
sebringj
8y ago
Yes this is a clear cut argument. The fact that the brain is hidden under the skull allows people to make statements that people's brains are all the same and its just effort after that. I think generally they are correct but there are
250.
▲
by
sebringj
8y ago
There is something to be said for that, 20/20 hindsight is easy to classify and mistakingly so bringing reasons for things unknown or impossible to know ahead of time is silly. I get that too.
251.
▲
by
sebringj
8y ago
I would say opportunity + curiosity + propensity is the formula and we know what curiosity and propensity are not chosen things. The other caveat is just anomalous ability and although rare we have strong evidence of these people existing.
252.
▲
by
sebringj
8y ago
Crazy genius. This is an example of someone born to do something.
253.
▲
by
sebringj
8y ago
The media one is a really interesting point. I did not consider that but makes sense.
254.
▲
by
sebringj
8y ago
actually i thought this but was too cowardly to say that directly.
255.
▲
by
sebringj
8y ago
Right but how does this benefit Peter directly? I was trying to think of many ways, both positive and negative. Tax benefits is a simplistic one...a possible negative way maybe crazy but if US innovation goes down because of Trump, possibly
256.
▲
by
sebringj
8y ago
I really enjoy hearing the minds here on their opinion of why Peter Thiel is backing Trump. I don't quite get the motivation and if there are any insights to this, please fire away.
257.
▲
by
sebringj
8y ago
Short lived JWT is ok for stitching desperate micro services together as it saves round trips to verify things but I prefer mystery tokens when using more intimate services that have access to similar underlying stores to verify them. Basic
258.
▲
by
sebringj
8y ago
Or maybe rephrase to "if you're looking for praise..." as i think it may be misplaced to expect it in mass unless you have had tons of user testing/feedback and iterations to move it that way. Opinion is just consensus a
259.
▲
by
sebringj
8y ago
I don't know if it's a bad future but it would limit our potential to our current biological evolution's zeitgeist. An analogy would be like giving the kids all the candy they wanted. It isn't good for them in the long r
260.
▲
by
sebringj
8y ago
Right this is a great point. Future "mates" would be entirely generated exactly tailored to one's neural pattern optimally in every dimension that is then projected onto some morphing android or in some VR future tech that wo
261.
▲
by
sebringj
8y ago
The Quest is a fantastic direction to go in making immediate playability and usability in real-world space with more than one player in the same area and without the PC/wires which is the problem with the other headsets. The Go is just
262.
▲
by
sebringj
8y ago
Couldn't a simulation also simulate our conclusions that we are not in one? It doesn't seem like one could answer this with any certainty in the end.
263.
▲
by
sebringj
8y ago
This is a theme in that all major compiled languages will have an ability to publish to wasm as WebAssembly is a standard that allows this and we'll see more frameworks like this coming up for various ones. It will be nice for all the
264.
▲
by
sebringj
8y ago
Right it becomes not science if it cannot be tested or verified i wonder if quantum computers are helping though in the sense as its a practical use of being in many states at once although not in the macro sense
265.
▲
by
sebringj
8y ago
:) maybe in spirit? I don't know but that may be a real question in the sense of this. Funny.
266.
▲
by
sebringj
8y ago
Thought this might be interesting about many-worlds https://www.hedweb.com/everett/everett.htm#believes if Feynman and Hawking and others are on board with it. I keep seeing with the string theorists and cosmologists t
267.
▲
by
sebringj
8y ago
This reminds me of animating paperback book pages as a transition to directly linking web pages. The paradigm is leaking over to the new one where the new one doesn't have a good way to do it yet. Instead, I would have a hall with port
268.
▲
by
sebringj
8y ago
"No cars allowed" possibly service vehicles to the shops? But I never see cars and looks like they are never supposed to drive there. https://www.google.com/maps/dir/ZOOMARS,+31791+Los+Rios+St,+... See
269.
▲
by
sebringj
8y ago
There has to be that balance of market places and convenience, not just a bunch of houses spaced far apart and wide streets. That isn't scalable. The suburbs are too sprawled where driving is necessary to get to anyplace useful if you
270.
▲
by
sebringj
8y ago
I think there is a big difference though. Theme parks are super over crowded and you end up having sore feet and wait in long lines all day and still having to hold on to your kids of fear of losing them in the crowd. I guess its still bett
More ›