3 ms·
Thought this might be interesting about many-worlds https://www.hedweb.com/everett/everett.htm#believes https://www.hedweb.com/everett/everett.htm#believes if F
by sebringj 8y ago
Thought this might be interesting about many-worlds https://www.hedweb.com/everett/everett.htm#believes https://www.hedweb.com/everett/everett.htm#believes if Feynman and Hawking and others are on board with it. I keep seeing with the string theorists and cosmologists that seem to be the leaders in the field are leaning toward many-worlds as the most sensible explanation. It then makes this article seem less interesting if the majority fall into copenhagen but the ones actually doing the real work are more in the many-worlds camp than not.
- visarga 8y agoIs Hawking still onboard?
- diminoten 8y agoUnfortunately, Hawking passed away in March of this year. :(
- escherplex 8y agoDepends. In an Everett (or Steins;Gate) sense, possibly. In a Bohm sense, probably not. :-) But string modeling has to be tested somehow and here you're dealing with essentially VR spaces and forms supervening on a quantum substrate with inascertainable so-called hidden variables. Probably need better brains to tackle this one.
- sebringj 8y agoRight it becomes not science if it cannot be tested or verified i wonder if quantum computers are helping though in the sense as its a practical use of being in many states at once although not in the macro sense
- sebringj 8y ago:) maybe in spirit? I don't know but that may be a real question in the sense of this. Funny.