sebasmannem

6 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by sebasmannem 3y ago

   Yeah, and let Postgres take care of redundancy. I agree that this is an interesting proposition. AFAIK PortWorkx could do a similar thing, but then with storage redundancy. Basically: - storage is synced to 3 local storage devices spread ac
2. 2.▲
   by sebasmannem 3y ago

   I also only run short term. I enable customers with designing and implementing the proper (CEPH e.a.) environment for their workloads. But I don't run their systems. I always handover to the rest of the technical staff. Bringing in a
3. 3.▲
   by sebasmannem 3y ago

   I both agree and don't agree about your comments. Benchmarks should be a comparison and one can very well do a comparison between exactly same deployment on exactly same infrastructure with 2 different storage types without going so de
4. 4.▲
   by sebasmannem 3y ago

   We have run benchmarks on our environment (CNPG, Openshift and CEPH in Dutch gov) and compared to Azure Postgres and (CNPG on) Azure AKS. Pgbench and pg_tps_optimizer. CEPH indeed is a 'high bandwidth / high latency' storage