seaurchinzee

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by seaurchinzee 1mo ago

   That website seems to suggest that Opus 5 spends ~57 cents per task, while GPT 5.6 Sol spends ~49 cents per task? That ratio doesn't feel quite right to me. Artificial Analysis says Opus 5 High costs nearly ~3x as much as GPT 5.6 Sol H
2. 2.▲
   by seaurchinzee 1mo ago

   According to the FrontierCode Extended benchmarks in the system "card" (page 169-170), Fable 5.1 apparently does best on the medium effort level for this benchmark: "[...] at higher efforts, Fable 5.1 occasionally adds more s
3. 3.▲
   by seaurchinzee 1mo ago

   Oh dang, that's really unfortunate, nice catch. At least Claude subscription users got a usage reset. But yeah, I can't help but feel Codex is far more generous with their subscription quota at the moment. I've been using Fab
4. 4.▲
   by seaurchinzee 1mo ago

   "Cache reads now cost 75% less, or $0.25 per million tokens." For me, at a typical 95% cache hit rate, I think my optimal context window size before autocompaction goes from ~200K to ~400K tokens. Great for longer horizon tasks.