Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
seangrogg
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
10 ms
·
61.
▲
by
seangrogg
3y ago
Mmm, I wonder how well this would work on a mobile device. Maybe I'll try grabbing my ubuntu touch here in a sec...
62.
▲
by
seangrogg
3y ago
FWIW I was previously using a host that at ~$24 was providing 8gb RAM which sounded okay, but that resulted in lots of lag, rubber-banding, and resulted in OOM errors roughly every 2-3 hours that brought the server down. I put about an hour
63.
▲
by
seangrogg
3y ago
Are you implying that large numbers are deities?
64.
▲
by
seangrogg
3y ago
> Compared to a company that [...] Time to press some keys on my keyboar- > Just don’t speak to xooglers about it. ;) Oh shit, nevermind, you get it.
65.
▲
by
seangrogg
3y ago
Yes, arrow functions have a different (and more intuitive) lexical `this` than their more verbose counterpart. It is subtly more than just a syntax sugar.
66.
▲
by
seangrogg
3y ago
Idle musing, but this is likely correct. If someone who isn't tech-minded is throwing together a quick blog in WordPress or something chances are they aren't going the extra mile to change the headers or add a reverse proxy just t
67.
▲
by
seangrogg
3y ago
Unfortunately to the best of my knowledge it does not.
68.
▲
by
seangrogg
3y ago
My credit union let me deposit checks via uploaded picture on browsers back around 2008ish. Don't get me wrong, I did this by taking a picture from my phone and emailing it to myself to upload - the smartphone UX simplifies that. But t
69.
▲
by
seangrogg
3y ago
> As I read the article, it occurred to me that one of the fundamental flaws of modern psychology (and its offshoots such as psychiatry and psychotherapy) is that they all tend toward a solipsistic, individualist treatment of the self. T
70.
▲
by
seangrogg
3y ago
It feels like a check against an input size of 10MB is something you would do well before deserialization, no?
71.
▲
by
seangrogg
4y ago
In all fairness, Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality was a phenomenal fanfic and if someone wants to see it syndicated at $30k that seems fine by me.
72.
▲
by
seangrogg
4y ago
I came to the comments explicitly looking for this :)
73.
▲
by
seangrogg
4y ago
This sounds a lot like Scott Young's stint of going through the MIT classwork for several degree paths; might give you some further inspiration! https://www.scotthyoung.com/blog/myprojects/mit-challenge-2/
74.
▲
by
seangrogg
4y ago
"Those who can't do, teach" is almost exclusively about money, the idea being that in almost every industry you would be paid more to do than to teach. Thus, if you are teaching it's likely because you failed to be a doe
75.
▲
by
seangrogg
4y ago
It's not totally useless when you find yourself needing to navigate around a gate covered in bubbles in a game of cloaked cat and mouse.
76.
▲
by
seangrogg
4y ago
Generally speaking, no. If you log off in a game-generated station you're safe. As well, if you successfully log off in space you will also be safe as I recall. But if you log off somewhere that's destructible I'm fairly cert
77.
▲
by
seangrogg
4y ago
“And.” I wrote. “And. And. And. And.” That was the part that led to the apocalypse. This was not a coincidence, because nothing is ever a coincidence.
78.
▲
by
seangrogg
5y ago
This should be fine. Assuming none of the tech stack is proprietary, patented, etc. you should be fine to continue using it as you see fit. And as you mentioned you're not creating a conflict of interest so that shouldn't be an is
79.
▲
by
seangrogg
5y ago
Seriously though! One of my Aussie buddies recently switched over to a recently-opened Oceanic server and while I was lamenting the loss we joked about not needing to step on each other's toes with scheduling.
80.
▲
by
seangrogg
5y ago
What in the what? I would wake up after my dad was gone for work, grab a pop-tart or cereal, take a ~1/4 mile walk outside to the bus stop, no longer able to see my house from the suburban sprawl, and hang out with the rest of the kids
81.
▲
by
seangrogg
5y ago
Here's to hoping!
82.
▲
by
seangrogg
5y ago
The US observance of DST was done for energy consumption, largely coming out of our 2 world wars when energy was a key issue. That said, in watching a state that relatively recently adopted DST, it actually increased energy consumption[1]
83.
▲
by
seangrogg
5y ago
> Policy decisions based on dodgy, whataboutism-esque figures You're arguing that people should increase their exposure to acute myocardial infarction (among other concerns) to account for dodgy whataboutism-esque energy consumption
84.
▲
by
seangrogg
5y ago
All I'm going to say is that - after experiencing about a decade of living in AZ and not worrying about toggling time - I'd still be in that camp that support permanently choosing a time.
85.
▲
by
seangrogg
5y ago
I'm all for either implementation of this (standard or savings); I have no particular skin in the game when it comes down to where daylight hours are positioned. Having lived about a decade in Arizona it literally never negatively impa
86.
▲
by
seangrogg
5y ago
> interest from senior engineers who want to work part time This is definitely of interest. In my experience, companies generally derive significant "senior engineer" value for a handful of things but then their time winds up b
87.
▲
by
seangrogg
5y ago
So your parent implied borrowing and selling the stock immediately to "receive cash from your broker now" and by doing so they are required to return the stock (unless the company goes bankrupt). In this way, you are both correc
88.
▲
by
seangrogg
5y ago
While you're correct to think that latency does indeed matter, I think what the article is trying to point out is that very few services are latency sensitive beyond what is traditionally expected . In many applications, there are cer
89.
▲
by
seangrogg
5y ago
The whole concept of paper wealth is literally around what you could hypothetically have, though. That's the whole point. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paper_wealth If you're sitting in a house and it has app
90.
▲
by
seangrogg
5y ago
> As if you do that for 10 years you have 4M dollars, 20 years? If you're making 400k post-tax, sure. If that's pre-tax income, however, you're not making 4M after 10 years. After federal taxes you're making closer to
More ›