Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
sean_hogle
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
Do you wait for the AI while it works if you are a lawyer?
1 points
by
sean_hogle
8mo ago
|
1 comments
2.
▲
The OJ Simpson Trial: Nothing Left of Consequence
(redline.net)
3 points
by
sean_hogle
2y ago
|
0 comments
3.
▲
by
sean_hogle
3y ago
Zoom's lawyers are trying to pull a fast one with these revised Terms. The new sentence on user consent being required to train AIs applies only to "Customer Content," not "Service Generated Data." In sec. 10.4, Zoo
4.
▲
by
sean_hogle
3y ago
In sec. 10.4, Zoom says "Notwithstanding the above, Zoom will not use audio, video or chat Customer Content to train our artificial intelligence models without your consent." Customer Content is defined in 10.1 broadly. But sec. 1
5.
▲
Technology services vendors and the dangers of IP indemnities
(epic.law)
2 points
by
sean_hogle
5y ago
|
0 comments
6.
▲
Confessions of a former Mac lawyer
(redline.net)
3 points
by
sean_hogle
8y ago
|
1 comments
7.
▲
A Cloud Service Provider's First and Best Line of Defense: Class Action Waivers
(linkedin.com)
2 points
by
sean_hogle
9y ago
|
0 comments
8.
▲
by
sean_hogle
10y ago
There are at least four US District court decisions that stand for the proposition that software qualifies as a work for hire as either a "contribution to a collective work" or a "compilation": iXL Inc. v. Adoutlet (N.D.
9.
▲
New labor law impedes effective legal representation of certain Cali residents
(linkedin.com)
2 points
by
sean_hogle
10y ago
|
0 comments
10.
▲
by
sean_hogle
10y ago
A few commenters dispute whether the IP non-assertion covenant applies to "Your Content", defined in the Amazon terms as "Content [that is, "software (including machine images), data, text, audio, video, or images"]
11.
▲
Amazon Web Services terms of use: run far away, run fast
(linkedin.com)
4 points
by
sean_hogle
10y ago
|
1 comments
12.
▲
Software Copyright and Innovation After Oracle v Google
(epiclaw.net)
70 points
by
sean_hogle
11y ago
|
25 comments
13.
▲
by
sean_hogle
14y ago
Of course DRM-enabled goods can be digitally resold. It depends on the type of DRM being used. That would be one reason to have DRM. As I said, Apple is working on this now.
14.
▲
by
sean_hogle
14y ago
This is completely wrongheaded. We don't want legal characterizations of these transactions to be "licenses". If what we pay money for is a good that we purchased, we get to keep that copy - and sell it if we no longer want it. Who cares if
15.
▲
Copyrightability of APIs: a small skirmish in a much larger war
(epiclaw.net)
2 points
by
sean_hogle
14y ago
|
0 comments
16.
▲
California employees bound by non-compete covenants
(epiclaw.net)
2 points
by
sean_hogle
15y ago
|
0 comments