sd9

16 ms·

271.
by sd9 2y ago
HN site guidelines request that the submission to HN has the same title as the article.
272.
by sd9 2y ago
You can get more than €60k. I am not a lawyer, but I've been in a similar situation recently. --- We were 50/50 partners; I was technical, he was business + provided the financing. In 18 months we built valuable IP, but it wasn&#x
273.
by sd9 2y ago
I find the tone jarring. The author is all over the place. It feels like the author is trying to brag with every quasi-unconventional activity they've taken. Hiking in the redwoods, climbing a 6800m mountain and joining DOGE are a trif
274.
by sd9 2y ago
This piece is reflective, discussing the author’s own goals and their refocus from professional to personal/lifestyle goals. It’s titled “Going with the seasons”. The current HN submission “You are chasing the wrong goals” doesn’t desc
275.
by sd9 2y ago
This actually sounds plausible and that it would be successful.
276.
by sd9 2y ago
So actually pretty big!
277.
by sd9 2y ago
Yes, Meta are economically incentivised to reduce the number of human reviews (assuming the cost of improving the model is worthwhile). This probably means fewer human reviewers reviewing a firehose, not the same number of human reviewers r
278.
by sd9 2y ago
I agree. But that might be comorbid with PTSD. It’s probably not good for you to be _that_ desensitised to this sort of thing. I also feel like there’s something intangible regarding intent that makes moderation different from being a docto
279.
by sd9 2y ago
I assumed that, at the margin, Meta would prioritise reducing false negatives. In other words, they would prefer that as many legitimate posts are published as possible. So the things that are flagged for human review would be on the bounda
280.
by sd9 2y ago
I don’t have any experience with this, so take this with a pinch of salt. What seems novel about moderation is the frequency that you confront disturbing things. I imagine companies like Meta have such good automated moderation that what
281.
by sd9 2y ago
For what it's worth, I enjoyed your tale, and I like Clojure
282.
by sd9 2y ago
It was clear that the language was Clojure by the middle of the third paragraph. Rust and Clojure are the only languages that always come with unsolicited sales pitches. Not knocking the languages, just observing. I was half expecting this
283.
by sd9 2y ago
> The Data Encryption Standard (DES) has constants that were given out by NSA. They turned out to be far from random, but instead made the algorithm resilient against differential cryptanalysis, a method not publicly known at the time. T
284.
by sd9 2y ago
What do you think sounds reasonable?
285.
by sd9 2y ago
Drop the "The", just "AI"
286.
by sd9 2y ago
I just tried it with ChatGPT 4o and it seemed to do a good enough job with the first prompt I tried (which I copied from your comment). https://chatgpt.com/share/66f530b0-3fb8-800a-8af9-8a3e48a31a...
287.
by sd9 2y ago
The Valve one has been floating around for years
288.
by sd9 2y ago
That seems reasonable. I understand Worker and Worklet are established concepts in the domain, though, so better to use those names than invent new terminology.
289.
by sd9 2y ago
The changing bit is at the beginning, unless I misunderstand you. Worker and Worklet are primitives, you can't really split them up. You can't have a LetWorkGlobalScope and an ErWorkGlobalScope, so WorkerGlobalScope and WorkletGlo
290.
by sd9 2y ago
Isn’t that FOMO?
291.
by sd9 2y ago
> The hospital said it had “no indication” his death was related to the transplant. Additionally, the transplant happened in March, which is “weeks ago” but not 2 weeks ago, which is the timeframe I initially assumed from the headline.
292.
by sd9 3y ago
Have you tried Starlink? I work in motorsports which has a similar problem, tracks being remote and internet access being minimal, but Starlink all but solved that for us (except unfortunately in countries without service).
293.
But why can't I use == for Strings? [video](youtube.com)
2 points by sd9 3y ago|2 comments
294.
by sd9 3y ago
I've done this before, it's a good solution. It's helpful to include relevant error messages to precisely explain what a future developer needs to do.
295.
by sd9 3y ago
I think that's exactly what OP is trying to say when they say 'correlation, not causation'. There is no causal link between 29th February and the bug, but they happened at the same time (were correlated, i.e. had the relation
296.
Java Builder Pattern Explained [video](youtube.com)
1 points by sd9 3y ago|0 comments
297.
by sd9 3y ago
Could be so they can track what you're looking at on the back end
298.
by sd9 3y ago
I’ve done it. There’s little cost, but it does feel unidiomatic in Java for some reason. Not sure whether I’d do it again or not. It’s hard to say how much benefit that I’m getting out of them.
299.
by sd9 3y ago
Except the article says the opposite: Some people have even speculated that the problems this year were deliberately formulated to foil ChatGPT, but Eric actually denied that this is the case. Citing the author of AoC: Here a
300.
United Airlines finds loose bolts on multiple Boeing 737 Max 9 planes(theguardian.com)
56 points by sd9 3y ago|1 comments

More ›