Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
scubbo
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
24 ms
·
361.
▲
by
scubbo
2y ago
> Creating a library also harms the development experience, because changes to the code no longer take effect immediately, as we need to build a library every time we make a change.[0] I see this criticism of libraries from monolith fans
362.
▲
by
scubbo
2y ago
(Speaking from the Option 2 camp) Exactly ! You finally get to fix them - doesn't that feel good!? :D (Yes, I understand your actual point :) )
363.
▲
by
scubbo
2y ago
I've heard it said that there are two kinds of Software Engineers when it comes to Factorio. There's one category who say "this is just like work, but I'm not getting paid to do it; why would I do this?" Then there&
364.
▲
by
scubbo
2y ago
> willing to buy things “site unseen” Heh - that eggcorn is actually applicable in this case, as they have not seen the Amazon website.
365.
▲
by
scubbo
2y ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peppercorn_(law)
366.
▲
by
scubbo
2y ago
> It being auto imported into their terminal program [...] seems a pretty killer offering for teams. I'm often pretty torn on recommendations like this - to use another tool to account for coworkers unwillingness to use (or, learn t
367.
▲
by
scubbo
2y ago
> Seems a good solution for sharing those dark arts folks tend to build up over time This is one of the things I most _dislike_ about it. Don't incentivize hording those useful tools in yet-another-silo, get them out into a shared c
368.
▲
by
scubbo
2y ago
Sorry you received unhelpful sass from other commenters. It stands for "Objective and Key Result" - it's a common "business-speak" initialism that basically translates to "a measurable, data-driven goal".
369.
▲
by
scubbo
2y ago
Oh! It was not clear to me at first that this was non-read-only, though in hindsight I should have concluded as much from the phrase "see what the others are looking at and and [sic, whoops!] what changes they propose in real-time"
370.
▲
by
scubbo
2y ago
Impressive stuff - especially for a 17-year-old working in their spare time! Best of luck, not that it looks like you'll need it!
371.
▲
by
scubbo
2y ago
> one person starts a collaboration session as host and invites others to join. The IDE extension distributes the contents of the hostʼs workspace and highlights text selections and cursor positions of other participants. In parallel, th
372.
▲
by
scubbo
2y ago
This was an impressively-"Garden Path" title, given the noun/verb ambiguity of "correct" and the modifier(?)/verb ambiguity of "measuring" :)
373.
▲
by
scubbo
2y ago
I am fortunate enough to not know why you're wrong (having only ever used Python for my own personal projects); but I've seen enough people claim that (in a corporate setting) you are, to be confident that they're right.
374.
▲
by
scubbo
2y ago
I have a friend who's still convinced that GameStop's going to the moon. Any day now...
375.
▲
by
scubbo
2y ago
Fascinating. My first response to your opening paragraph was horror - how on Earth could you hope to really internalize and learn from a textbook without taking notes on it? - before realizing that you were (mostly) referring to fiction or
376.
▲
by
scubbo
2y ago
Absolutism like this hurts adoption of otherwise-useful tools. Given the choice between a tool which simply cannot play DRM-protected content, and a tool which can, _ceteris paribus_ most consumers will prefer the former. If you believe the
377.
▲
by
scubbo
2y ago
To extend the previous commenter's simile - a man is a _product_ of his genetic code, but is also affected by environment. Bringing it back to the point at hand - yes, you are right that people can make bad code with good tools, but th
378.
▲
by
scubbo
2y ago
Interesting to note that almost all of these are to do with tooling _around_ the codebase, not the contents _of_ the codebase!
379.
▲
by
scubbo
2y ago
That's a great answer, thank you! Yeah, "someone non-consensually has low-accuracy information on me" is experientially different than "someone is using (more-accurate) information on me to serve me ads". The former
380.
▲
by
scubbo
2y ago
Fair point!
381.
▲
by
scubbo
2y ago
Why would a person who objects to Facebook tracking them via their actual profile not object to Facebook tracking them via inferences?
382.
▲
by
scubbo
2y ago
Very cool tool!
383.
▲
by
scubbo
2y ago
That one is optimized to be a web site and the other is optimized to be a personal note-taking platform? ;P
384.
▲
by
scubbo
2y ago
> Implementation-wise this withdrawal can involve, updating two accounts Can't wait to read the incident report when one of the consumers successfully receives and reads the message but the other doesn't.
385.
▲
by
scubbo
2y ago
Right, yes, I can absolutely see their point. My point in return, to be explicit, was that "well-trained model" is a deceptively simple-sounding phrase which makes it sound like such a thing is commonplace, extant, or easy to iden
386.
▲
by
scubbo
2y ago
> I can be certain that a well trained machine will not call me slurs for being brown "well-trained" is doing a lot of heavy-lifting, there. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tay_(chatbot)
387.
▲
by
scubbo
2y ago
> I can trace all the way through multiple services easily on a simple detailed flame graph in our systems I'm not sure what point is being made here. It's good that you can do that - but are you implying that that's not p
388.
▲
by
scubbo
2y ago
Amen. Event-driven architecture makes it easier to bury your head in the sand, and harder to implement an actually-working feature.
389.
▲
by
scubbo
2y ago
Fittingly, today I was stuck on a problem with a Python library[0], and tried asking ChatGPT. Three different times, it answered similar-but-different problems (while presenting them as genuine answers to my issue). We have a ways to go bef
390.
▲
by
scubbo
2y ago
Whether or not therapy would help with _this particular_ problem (I happen to disagree with you, but that's neither here nor there), it remains one of the most beneficial and healthy things that a human can do for themself.
More ›