Right, yes, I can absolutely see their point. My point in return, to be explicit, was that "well-trained model" is a deceptively simple-sounding phrase which ma

Right, yes, I can absolutely see their point. My point in return, to be explicit, was that "well-trained model" is a deceptively simple-sounding phrase which makes it sound like such a thing is commonplace, extant, or easy to identify. It's almost a No True Scotsman fallacy - yes, a "well-trained model" (by your own definitions of well-trained, though perhaps not the LLM creators') will not abuse you, by definition. Neither will a well-trained human.