Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
scott_w
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
17 ms
·
301.
▲
by
scott_w
1y ago
I’m calling you a smug asshole
302.
▲
by
scott_w
1y ago
It wasn't an accident. I just wanted to highlight the point that you eloquently proved for me with your comment.
303.
▲
by
scott_w
1y ago
>> Kramnik should be held accountable for making Danya's life hell the past year OP is not blaming him specifically for Danya's death. Irrespective of that, Kramnik is behaving like a total cunt and treated Danya like abso
304.
▲
by
scott_w
1y ago
> But of course, blaming the victim is much easier because it lets the person doing the blaming pretend they're morally and intellectually superior in some way. Thanks for proving my point.
305.
▲
by
scott_w
1y ago
> "Fraud allegations" Financial fraud. This isn't something the average person is going to dig up on their own because they aren't going to start reading the FT and WSJ before they buy a car. > This is what google
306.
▲
by
scott_w
1y ago
The chess community is generally against it, though they're also laughing at Kramnik for his absurd his behaviour is. I'd be surprised if Kramnik's behaviour is a major contributing factor (given we don't know anything a
307.
▲
by
scott_w
1y ago
> You don't need any particularly deep due diligence to see that, in fact, not living under a rock is more than enough. From May 2025: https://cleantechnica.com/2025/05/05/us-consumers-dont-trust... O
308.
▲
by
scott_w
1y ago
You say this as though it's trivial to just see that Tesla is a scam. There's multiple decades of fawning articles and reviews of Tesla to the point where the average person can't be blamed for assuming they're a reputab
309.
▲
by
scott_w
1y ago
I’m not sure if you’re joking or you’re thinking of a different type of “metric.” The metrics I think you’re referring to are the ones you collect throughout your product, which I think the article author would advocate you continue to coll
310.
▲
by
scott_w
1y ago
As someone who’s dipped their toes in it, I’d say Rust is complicated in theory but not as complicated in practice. I said on a different topic that LLMs help a bit with suggestions and you can start with suboptimal code, improving it as yo
311.
▲
by
scott_w
1y ago
This is a very different situation. If you're interested, I'd recommend reading Can't We Print More Money by staff at the Bank of England ( https://www.amazon.co.uk/Cant-Just-Print-More-Money/dp/18479
312.
▲
by
scott_w
1y ago
> If the machine shop is so tightly constrained and error-phobic, that sounds like there's very little space of tinkering For plenty of industries, margins dictate that this is the desired outcome. The goal is to optimise output, no
313.
▲
by
scott_w
1y ago
Funnily enough, this caused issues with PS2 games ported to Xbox subsequently. Metal Gear Solid 2 made heavy use of the pressure sensitive buttons for weapon aiming vs shooting. I recall the Xbox didn't have pressure sensitive buttons,
314.
▲
by
scott_w
1y ago
> If they are doing nothing bad they have nothing to fear from electorate. Some possible reasons: - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attempted_assassination_of_Don... - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki
315.
▲
by
scott_w
1y ago
> And even in cases where the problem is 'we might get sued', the fact that you have someone else to sue is to a large extent multiplying problems because you now have two lawsuits. To be fair, I’m not sure if this is a huge is
316.
▲
by
scott_w
1y ago
The person implementing the system for the hospital is accountable. I don’t see why this is difficult because it would be the same if that person built their own product from scratch. There’s no vendor here that they can sue if they were pa
317.
▲
by
scott_w
1y ago
I'm biased as I've not been a beginner dev for nearly 20 years, however I have found Copilot is pretty helpful for is learning Rust. In combination with Intellisense, it helps ease some of the mental overhead of the syntax, lettin
318.
▲
by
scott_w
1y ago
I guess you could see it like that but I don’t think it’s “wash trading” in the sense that they’re coordinating it. I don’t really know what the fed would investigate here.
319.
▲
by
scott_w
1y ago
Unless they're trying to force them on you, no, they're not. Them being annoying as fuck doesn't mean they're dishonest.
320.
▲
by
scott_w
1y ago
Perhaps but it's the norm. I try to preface what I write with "I agree" just to try and clarify my position ahead of time. Remember that there's a bunch of context missing in text such as facial expressions, body languag
321.
▲
by
scott_w
1y ago
This is dangerous because of how easy it is to abuse. Look at Türkiye where İmamoğlu was arrested and had his university degree removed on trumped up charges as he's a potential threat to Erdoğan's chances of re-election. In Türki
322.
▲
by
scott_w
1y ago
> you don't seem to actually read anything I say I've done nothing but quote and answer your responses, while you ignore my questions and (wilfully?) misinterpret everything I say and projecting your own behaviour onto me. Don&
323.
▲
by
scott_w
1y ago
> This is an issues with the employer not following the checklist, which I posted in my first response to you And yet you don't seem to have an answer to "what happens when they don't follow it?" > You original cla
324.
▲
by
scott_w
1y ago
> However this scenarios is still extremely unlikely. I watched a video just yesterday from someone (middle class) who explained that, by not having a passport, it took him weeks to get the necessary documentation together to prove his r
325.
▲
by
scott_w
1y ago
> This is not an argument, and is merely a way to shut someone up because you don't like them disagreeing with you. It is quite a loathsome tactic. Ok, let me break the argument down for you: 1. Person needs job 2. Person doesn'
326.
▲
by
scott_w
1y ago
Your privilege is showing. > You need a passport for a right to work check. I've been through this process about 3 times in the last 5 years. It isn't difficult or onerous. A new passport costs over £100 for a paper application
327.
▲
by
scott_w
1y ago
Most tenancy agreements are just printed off by a landlord, so they're absolutely useless as proof of address. > if they do include address, you will also need to start by providing a proof of address to the Digital ID system! Yes,
328.
▲
by
scott_w
1y ago
That's not the case in the UK. You need a utility bill (gas, electric, council tax, bank statement) or an existing bank customer to verify your identity. It's only in the past 5-10 years that electronic statements have been accept
329.
▲
by
scott_w
1y ago
Allow me to repeat myself: > This limits their options of bank accounts. Now this: > Which has no relation to Digital IDs whatsoever Other countries use their ID systems for exactly this purpose, so I don't see how this has "
330.
▲
by
scott_w
1y ago
A driving license isn’t sufficient for right to work checks because you can have a driving license without being able to work. For shits and giggles, I just looked up the checker on the UK Gov website and… if you don’t have a passport or ea
More ›