Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
scoot
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
91.
▲
by
scoot
11mo ago
While we're on the subject, if you brush after meals, you're doing it wrong. Brush first thing in the morning (before your first meal/drink, other than water), and last thing at night (well after your last meal). Plaque acid
92.
▲
by
scoot
11mo ago
@dang
93.
▲
by
scoot
11mo ago
Or you could, you know, read the article before commenting to see the limited scope of this integration? Anyway, Google has already integrated Gemini into Sheets, and recently added direct spreadsheet editing capability so your comment was
94.
▲
by
scoot
1y ago
/out of touch/out of reach/ ?
95.
▲
by
scoot
1y ago
Got it! Thanks for clarifying
96.
▲
by
scoot
1y ago
Said by someone who hasn't been to the less affluent parts of London, I suspect.
97.
▲
by
scoot
1y ago
Laudable, or laughable? I only ask because "laudable" didn't quite seem to fit with most of the examples you gave.
98.
▲
by
scoot
1y ago
Where is this quote from? I couldn't see it in the article. If true, wouldn't that simply lead to wanted suspects simply avoiding the cameras, meaning innocent people who aren't monitoring these notifications to have their fa
99.
▲
by
scoot
1y ago
I haven't seen anything that mentions that trademarks are business classification specific. See Apple Corporation (the computer company) vs. Apple Corp (The Beatles holding company) for example. Deepki is in a very different space to D
100.
▲
by
scoot
1y ago
Love it. Going to use that with non-OpenAI LLMs until they catch up.
101.
▲
by
scoot
1y ago
Or “decimated”’to mean “practically destroyed” when it means the opposite…
102.
▲
by
scoot
1y ago
I'm pretty sure this has been debunked as an online myth, and no such documentary exists. If you can show otherwise, I'd love to watch it
103.
▲
by
scoot
1y ago
I'm pretty sure that got debunked as a handful of overfitted examples that fall apart as soon as you leave the area that was 3D recorded. Google's new tech is on another level entirely.
104.
▲
by
scoot
1y ago
That seems very expensive for assisted suicide
105.
▲
by
scoot
1y ago
Yes, breaking a single sentence in two, hence beginning a sentence with "E.g.". At least stylistically if not grammatically incorrect.
106.
▲
by
scoot
1y ago
Where does Perplexity sit in this race? I was aware of their "deep research" first, but that doesn't mean it was. They've recently removed (limited) use of it from the free plan, so I guess it was costing more than they
107.
▲
by
scoot
1y ago
"Soon" being tomorrow, next week, next month? Just stating the obvious, but taking 30 minutes to do it now while you have traction on HN seems like a no-brainer.
108.
▲
by
scoot
1y ago
And I'm not surprised to see "e.g." being used incorrectly. ;)
109.
▲
by
scoot
1y ago
Fortunately neither of these is likely to cause an aviation incident or accident.
110.
▲
by
scoot
1y ago
Both result in a crash – the first due to pilot error, the second due to mechanical failure.
111.
▲
by
scoot
1y ago
> We determined that the probable cause of this accident was the in-flight separation of the left MED plug I find this very strangely worded. It was an "incident", not an "accident"; and "the in-flight separation
112.
▲
by
scoot
1y ago
> Most of my students struggle to organise or bookmark the hundreds of pages they've created using ChatGPT I'm struggling to imagine how you could possibly know this (sounds like projection to me), but assuming it's true,
113.
▲
by
scoot
1y ago
> there’s no real sense of “this is my project on climate change” or “this is the story I’m working on.” It’s just one long chat thread perplexity.ai (a meta-ai) partly solves that problem by at least allowing you to group chats in "
114.
▲
by
scoot
1y ago
I'm imagining the application of text adventures specifically designed for second language learning. Quite the possibilities!
115.
▲
by
scoot
1y ago
"That's not a verb I recognise." (So. Many. Times!) Sorry, but that isn't a verb recognition problem, it's a comprehension problem. I agree with the downvoted poster that LLM integration would significantly improve
116.
▲
by
scoot
1y ago
Ouch, ok, yes, point taken...
117.
▲
by
scoot
1y ago
And on social media. Maybe I'm being too literal and pedantic, but it bugs me that they say "nobody" can read your messages. What's the point of using it if even the recipient can't read them (or the sender for that
118.
▲
by
scoot
1y ago
Is this just of passing interest, or something that "ists" (scientists, geologists, climatologists etc.) would gain potentially valuable data by taking samples from it?
119.
▲
by
scoot
1y ago
I was referring to the web applications themselves, rather than the marketing, documentation, or support websites. In large vendors, those tend to come from a different part of the organisation, so are often superior to the products themsel
120.
▲
by
scoot
1y ago
And UIs that are neither beautiful nor function (looking at you Salesforce, Oracle, SAP, and many other "Enterprise" applications). If any of these were functional, most users wouldn't care about the visual appeal. NN were co
More ›