Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
scoopdewoop
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
31.
▲
by
scoopdewoop
1y ago
Sit down. The right wing is actively zip-tying entire apartment complexes of poor people, even US citizens, while pointing guns in their faces. Thats violence, and exactly what the left has been ringing the alarm for for years.
32.
▲
by
scoopdewoop
1y ago
Whoever you are imagining has nothing to do with me. Enjoy debating your spooky stalinist strawmen.
33.
▲
by
scoopdewoop
1y ago
This is ahistorical conspiracy theory. First, state communists kill anarchists. That's history. Second, the Soviets were incredibly dogmatic about science because they used it to justify their materialist ideology. They promoted Lysenk
34.
▲
by
scoopdewoop
1y ago
This isn't an anti-science critique. It's a philosophical argument about how science actually operates. I'm not coming at this from a populist authoritarian angle! (Literally my views were influenced by Feyerabend, an academi
35.
▲
by
scoopdewoop
1y ago
That is a really naive epistemology. Science as an objective methodology that churns out truth doesn't exist. Its a human endeavor full of interests. Religion is also a human endeavor full of interests, and can also ascertain certain t
36.
▲
by
scoopdewoop
1y ago
What platform? Android is removing installing software from "unverified" developers which leads to this exact same scenario.
37.
▲
by
scoopdewoop
1y ago
If Larry Ellison outlives me so help me god
38.
▲
by
scoopdewoop
1y ago
I once had a boss that used to really hate python. He would roll his eyes whenever it was brought up. He was CTO of the company and he would sneer at it. One day, in a one-to-one meeting, I asked him, "what is so bad about python?"
39.
▲
by
scoopdewoop
1y ago
This has an nvme with the OS pre-installed.
40.
▲
by
scoopdewoop
1y ago
I understood and considered both things you could have meant. Either way I think you come off as an armchair coder that overstates what rust safety actually is (its not abstract, i enumerated it). You are doing rust a disservice in the most
41.
▲
by
scoopdewoop
1y ago
> If we could wave a magic wand and make all code safe with no downsides, who among us wouldn't? Anybody would, but Rust is not that wand, and there is no wand. Code needs to _exist_ in order to matter. Time is finite, my free-time
42.
▲
by
scoopdewoop
1y ago
I think its a bad take because "Developers are not Idiots" and "be disciplined" are not good arguments. Its just choosing to ignore the problem rust solves. I am fine with ignoring the problems that rust solves, but not
43.
▲
by
scoopdewoop
1y ago
This is a really bad take, on par with the "we don't need types" post from last week. The thing I wish we would remember, as developers, is that not all programs need to be so "safe". They really, truly don't.
44.
▲
by
scoopdewoop
1y ago
Business consolidation is a civil rights issue. Now every industry is led by giant monopolies that owe the administration favors. The appeasement of autocrats by capitalists for more market control is so inextricable from capitalism itself
45.
▲
by
scoopdewoop
1y ago
BRB, waiting for capitalists to solve the housing and healthcare crisis, shouldn't be long...
46.
▲
by
scoopdewoop
1y ago
Labor, FOSS... can you not imagine anything besides wealthy people creating artificial scarcity to force others to work for them? Edit: if you don't think this is true, look at the history of truly any country and see what happens when
47.
▲
by
scoopdewoop
1y ago
I have been so discouraged by the way that web3 crypto hucksters pounced on vibe-coding. I truly enjoy programming with AI, it is my favorite hobby by a mile. I'm also happy to say that, for now, I get to capture some of the productivi
48.
▲
by
scoopdewoop
1y ago
In a world where we produced so much that we have caused climate change and mass extinction, I can't imagine people being less enterprising and productive being a truly bad thing.
49.
▲
by
scoopdewoop
1y ago
Well said, I see where you are coming from.
50.
▲
by
scoopdewoop
1y ago
Honest question, why isn't vigilantism okay? What are people supposed to do? Vote? We voted for the public healthcare guy in 2008 and the powers-that-be decided they would rather back "muslim ban" demagogues than let that hap
51.
▲
by
scoopdewoop
1y ago
Glad to hear you love laws, you can start with wage theft: comparable in scale, basically unenforced
52.
▲
by
scoopdewoop
1y ago
I'm a week late, but I do appreciate you pointing out this real phenomenon of moving the goalpost. Language is really general, multimodal models even more-so. The idea that AGI should be way more anthropomorphic and omnipotent is reall
53.
▲
by
scoopdewoop
1y ago
https://youtu.be/fbzHNBT0nl0 This video blew my mind wide open about the double slit experiment by showing the simpler case, the single slit experiment, and I think it clears up a LOT! Sadly, I can't do the explanation
54.
▲
by
scoopdewoop
1y ago
It is bold to assume these products will even exist in a year
55.
▲
by
scoopdewoop
1y ago
This is an interesting premise. The timbre of instruments largely due to the harmonics that they exhibit, and for natural instruments these tend to be simple whole number ratios that we replicate in our scales in just temperament, and appro
56.
▲
by
scoopdewoop
2y ago
probably, lol
57.
▲
by
scoopdewoop
2y ago
> you couldn’t tell your friend, “You calculate steps 1 through 50 while I calculate steps 51 through 100.” For that example, couldn't you do exactly that? Multiplication is commutative
58.
▲
by
scoopdewoop
2y ago
Ha, reminds me of Duke Nukem mirrors which are essentially the same thing, looking through a window to mirrored geometry
59.
▲
by
scoopdewoop
2y ago
Why do you think your issue has anything to do with electron? That sounds like a meme. It is your drives, no? Does the browser make your system drives work a bunch? Much more likely, it is VSCode running ripgrep (rg in htop/activity mo
60.
▲
by
scoopdewoop
3y ago
I would love to hear any explanation for why they should get a penny of taxpayer money after spending >$150B in stock buybacks. They spent their money on enriching the rich.
More ›