scharman

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by scharman 2y ago

   Looks like a great service - kudos! Hope it succeeds and competes with imgur!
2. 2.▲
   by scharman 2y ago

   This is a great response. The shady operators can ruin simple services like these :( I’m now curious how you’d ever practically deal with this. How does iCloud deal with encrypted illegal content? Surely they can’t penalize Apple in these s
3. 3.▲
   by scharman 2y ago

   You’ve intrigued me! Can you provide a link to such a hosting option? I’ve got some side projects I’d like to explore! Thanks in advance
4. 4.▲
   by scharman 3y ago

   I’m not a crypto geek! But, I thought the block size had to be smaller than the key size?
5. 5.▲
   by scharman 3y ago

   Exactly. The code is adjusting for responsiveness. With less cpus you need a smaller minimum slice. As you have more cpus you can increase the slice and still schedule the same number of processes per second. E.g. 1 ms slice with 1 core = 1
6. 6.▲
   by scharman 4y ago

   I believe it just emits at least one packet on each system 'write' call. As long as your 'write' invocations are larger blocks then I'd expect you'd see very little difference with O_NDELAY enabled or disabled.
7. 7.▲
   by scharman 5y ago

   ok, u got me - it was clearly a parody, but the whitepaper made me check and it took a few seconds to click. Love ur work!