sbuk

57 ms·

721.
by sbuk 5y ago
Until it is.
722.
by sbuk 5y ago
That can be done with Thunderbird/Enigmail and with GPGTool in mail.app. If the key is on a public server, then decryption can be done by anyone. The point is that Proton is categorically not E2EE sending to 3rd parties. It can’t be
723.
by sbuk 5y ago
Proton to Proton might be E2EE. Proton to any other service is almost certainly not. I'd suggest that their marketing is not exactly transparent. Their 'zero-access encryption' only applies to mailboxes stored in their envi
724.
by sbuk 5y ago
https://nakedsecurity.sophos.com/2020/01/09/apples-scanning-... https://web.archive.org/web/20200119050834/https://www.apple... Please. This information is out there. It t
725.
by sbuk 5y ago
> Still nobody found an answer why Apple did not scan iCloud for CSAM? They do.
726.
by sbuk 5y ago
Apple currently do scan for CSAM in their cloud.
727.
by sbuk 5y ago
Because the don't tell anyone what they are scanning?
728.
by sbuk 5y ago
Why would Walmart allow Kelloggs to advertise their products availability for less in a different store, on Walmart's shelves? Or Kelloggs saying that you can pay them direct and the just help yourself to their product from Walmart? It
729.
by sbuk 5y ago
Headline has been editorialised - Actual headline: Apple and Google ordered by Russia's media authority to take down the app of Vladimir Putin's biggest opponent
730.
by sbuk 5y ago
They cost as much as any similar laptop. In fact in the space, they are very competetive. This has been discussed here ad nauseum.
731.
by sbuk 5y ago
The thing to remember is that these are useless unless the recipients MTA is configured to take action against failures. Another thing to understand is that very few services, commercial, public or otherwise, send DMARC reports, and many th
732.
by sbuk 5y ago
- Non-native client - limited family sharing - unreliable auto-fill…
733.
by sbuk 5y ago
Again, the point that you as a developer are missing is that your behavior is atleast as, if not more abusive towards your end user than Apple are being. Why should your user have to use an anti-privacy 3rd party like Facebook to use yo
734.
by sbuk 5y ago
The thing is, Apple only 'force' you to add their option if you have an app on the store and offer another form of public federated identity provider. If you don't want to offer Apple as an option, then don't offer anyon
735.
by sbuk 5y ago
There are other ways to do password recovery. Email is categorically not the only solution to this problem.
736.
by sbuk 5y ago
Equally, developers need to respect their users. I don't want to have to have a Facebook or Google account to use your product. Why should I be interested in your app if you force me you use either of those options? They were also invo
737.
by sbuk 5y ago
So Editors Drafts are 'Standards' now?
738.
by sbuk 5y ago
Is it any more or less abhorrent than Google blatant embrace, extend, extinguish approach to the open web?
739.
by sbuk 5y ago
How about how open? Browser specific JS is a misnomer because blink and V8 have ~70% market share. This is a bad thing for the open web. It was a bad thing when it was IE6, and allowing chromium based browser to grow beyond 70% while Googl
740.
by sbuk 5y ago
And they tell you this is happening. The links I shared illustrate Google and Mozilla doing things without asking or informing the user. Apple do indeed have form in this area too, battery/processor throttling springs to mind. Wi
741.
by sbuk 5y ago
Which itself is a replica of Akzidenz Grotesk.
742.
by sbuk 5y ago
Let's leave the goalposts where they are. Besides, I'm extremely confident that Apple only ever used Google for mapping in the early days of iOS/iPhone OS. In which case, if you took the time to read the ToS, it's there.
743.
by sbuk 5y ago
That seem like an ideal situation. Which 'web' are you referring to? The standards compliant, semantically structured one, or the Google 'web'?
744.
by sbuk 5y ago
Google and Mozilla's track record? https://www.csoonline.com/article/3243284/firefox-users-are-... https://www.pcmag.com/archive/google-accused-of-tracking-saf...
745.
by sbuk 5y ago
The issue that is so often missed is that it wasn't the fact that IE was bundled as the default or that it had the largest market share. Very simply, the issue was how that market share was attained. Microsoft threatend to withdraw O
746.
by sbuk 5y ago
To be fair to you, there is not a lot that can be done about the other two things that you don't like. Everyone knows that gaming on the Mac is limited, as is hardware choice. The reason that most people latch on the mouse comment
747.
by sbuk 5y ago
"Single button mouse"... You did exactly this. Edit: changed to the relevant statement
748.
by sbuk 5y ago
The same was true when IE dominated. The point being missed is if a single browser is allowed to dominate across the board, the owners of the technology become the gatekeepers of web technologies. That would have been extremely bad under Mi
749.
by sbuk 5y ago
Thanks. That makes sence, although Docker on the M1 seems to have improved things. If it's any consolation, my 3 year old tries to touch things on computer and TV screens! It's clearly an natural interaction given the technology a
750.
by sbuk 5y ago
I'm interested in the ' touchscreen support or the Linux integration.' part of your comment. I don't think we'll see touch screen on a Mac in the short-to-middle term because Apple have very defined views on interac

More ›