sbrass

6 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by sbrass 6y ago

   Numberphile did cover this some years ago, see for example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AxJubaijQbI
2. 2.▲
   by sbrass 6y ago

   The author suggests that security has to be enforced by the system itself, i.e. by the usage of an appropriate programming language, security tools (e.g. sand-boxing, ...) and other. However, the author's comment fell short to honor th
3. 3.▲
   Why is there no documentation on GMON_OUT_PREFIX for gprof in glibc?(stackoverflow.com)

   1 points by sbrass 6y ago|0 comments
4. 4.▲
   by sbrass 7y ago

   As already stated by the other commenters, the author had already submitted the paper to arXiv in mid of March. So, I don't think that it falls in anyway under April's fool (and I don't think that in this serious situation an
5. 5.▲
   by sbrass 7y ago

   Thanks for your interesting insight in your projects. I'm using org-mode profoundly since 2015 for a lot of my daily note taking routines. Additionally, I've started two years ago to work some of my readmes/tutorials with org
6. 6.▲
   by sbrass 7y ago

   I would have agreed then, in 2014, maybe, one or two years later, completely with GnuPG's statement on ECC support. I cannot state whether any of the other open-source and free projects on encryption have advanced to ECC, however, I wo
7. 7.▲
   by sbrass 7y ago

   Thanks for the great post! However, I discourage the usage of RSA with 4096 bit as it does not offer any substantial security over RSA with 2048 bit. The mean idea behind the "No-4096-bit" is nicely explained by GnuPG people thems