saurik

42 ms·

1. 541.▲
   by saurik 2y ago

   I spent over a decade being the center of the ecosystem for something akin to web extensions for native Objective-C++ apps on iOS/macOS. I maintained a similar solution for Android/Java, and was starting work on something similar
2. 542.▲
   by saurik 2y ago

   I don't know if I agree that this is "it does" as this isn't really "not out of the box" and kind of "fully external", but what I continue to be surprised by is that Apache DOES come with this functio
3. 543.▲
   by saurik 2y ago

   I understood that. As Apache does have a way for me to internally automate all of that, without using an external tool such as certbot, I am surprised that nginx doesn't as well. Either way, you should add Apache to your list of server
4. 544.▲
   by saurik 2y ago

   Why wouldn't the argument here that courts and judges aren't experts at anything not apply to every single decision they make? If we're simply going to decide that courts shouldn't be trusted to decide anything "har
5. 545.▲
   by saurik 2y ago

   If this "obscures the call order" then isn't that a problem with the programming language in general? If these functions weren't async, would you also not be willing to use g(f()), as that "obscures the call order&q
6. 546.▲
   by saurik 2y ago

   I mean, you didn't even try :/. const myAsyncThing = async (init) => await task2(await task1(init)) This makes the promise chain look much more like what it is, given that the rest of the language uses nesting calls to
7. 547.▲
   by saurik 2y ago

   I agree with you, but I think the comment is about replacing Google, not replacing Auth0.
8. 548.▲
   by saurik 2y ago

   I don't know if it handles this unexpected-revocation scenario, but as Apache has had support for automated Let's Encrypt for a while now (I finally upgraded last week, when I realized I was missing out on this feature), I'm
9. 549.▲
   by saurik 2y ago

   Look: my issue is that the kitty developer clearly thinks of himself as "God's gift to terminals". I pointed at one specific issue that I think is "telling" of an attitude of "I know better than everyone else&q
10. 550.▲
    by saurik 2y ago

    I mean I might be "lying"... or I might be confusing him with the Gnome Terminal developers, with respect to that one specific tiny quote about "not liking settings". (FWIW, the setting in question with respect to make m
11. 551.▲
    by saurik 2y ago

    If nothing else, to get consistent notifications from the creators you are a patron of, as Apple dragged their feet on web app notifications for many years, and they are still crippled and unreliable.
12. 552.▲
    by saurik 2y ago

    Does there happen to be a native analog to this? So like, if I eventually want some kind of native app, I wouldn't have to throw away the architecture entirely and start over? I only see mention of the WASM version of this in the websi
13. 553.▲
    by saurik 2y ago

    Yeah: the kitty developer is definitely the sort who believes that he not only knows better than everyone else how to use a terminal, but that everyone else's opinions are fundamentally invalid. That his terminal fails to correctly ren
14. 554.▲
    by saurik 2y ago

    Have you tried xterm? It takes a bit longer to configure, as its defaults are universally horrible, but I've found the result to be worth the effort. FWIW, it has this feature you are talking about as part of it's "print&quot
15. 555.▲
    by saurik 2y ago

    If anyone needs one of these, there is an UNofficial implementation by Cloudflare, which is used in Warp. https://github.com/cloudflare/boringtun
16. 556.▲
    by saurik 2y ago

    These are arguments why people would want to access the content over a secure encrypted channel, not reasons for the website to force them to; and, in fact, in this frame, it frankly seems like a BAD idea to SILENTLY force them to, as that
17. 557.▲
    by saurik 2y ago

    I am extremely sympathetic to the "SSL inherently breaks the promise of the web" arguments, and yet this story makes no sense... why is the cost of converting a website to use SSL being measured in gigabytes of content rather than
18. 558.▲
    by saurik 2y ago

    FWIW, I have built something like this--including safely reimplementing the deserialization of that old "streamtyped" format, though not necessarily dealing with "the full corpus of iMessage features", as I thankfully
19. 559.▲
    by saurik 2y ago

    So? "Google is the best search engine we have today" doesn't make them an entity we should deign to like :/... a majority of the things brought up in this article are people hating Google for dominating markets and the
20. 560.▲
    by saurik 2y ago

    FWIW, when this same URL was being discussed two years ago, someone looked into it and decided that it was, in fact, "Wireguard over TLS". https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33171089
21. 561.▲
    by saurik 2y ago

    This was "published" now, but this same URL was discussed two years ago here about the same thing? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33170028
22. 562.▲
    by saurik 2y ago

    FWIW, Gates McFadden was in an episode of ST:TNG called "The Wounded" along with Bob Gunton, who was in JFK (along with Kevin Bacon). https://m.imdb.com/title/tt0708825/ https://m.imdb.com&#x2
23. 563.▲
    by saurik 2y ago

    FWIW, Samsung batteries explode even if you don't use them as servers, and in fact it was an issue with their batteries being trash (I think I remember it being that they had been contaminated with metal filings, but I might be entirel
24. 564.▲
    by saurik 2y ago

    1) Just because something is dumb doesn't mean there is any good reason for it to be that way, but also 2) it in fact is that simple for Firefox, with the exception that it kind of forces you to have at least one active tab per window.
25. 565.▲
    by saurik 2y ago

    I am getting a 401 on this URL. > You don't have permission to access the resource. Looking at the URL, it certainly feels incorrect...
26. 566.▲
    by saurik 2y ago

    > NEVER pretend to be human, and NEVER imply you have emotion or personality I mean, this one is probably going to be really hard, and, frankly, might never happen or even be somewhat impossible to square with it being intelligent... it
27. 567.▲
    by saurik 2y ago

    If you want to spawn a new process on Darwin you really want to reach for posix_spawn, not any variant of fork. Using this API should also do whatever is optimal on Linux, which still doesn't seem to be merely calling vfork, as you ins
28. 568.▲
    by saurik 2y ago

    So... more vaporware? :( Whatever happened to that new voice interface they "announced" back in May? I wish companies would stick to "releasing" things rather than "announcing" them...
29. 569.▲
    by saurik 2y ago

    Sure: if we believe that having a giant third-party in the sky that does verification of users itself a giant privacy violation that the web currently doesn't require us to subject ourselves to--and if we also believe that the informat
30. 570.▲
    by saurik 2y ago

    To build a verified 18+ network inherently requires undermining some privacy to determine, as you are now collecting ID from all of the users of your (e.g.) fetlife platform. The responsibility and liability should be with parents to preven