Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
saurik
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
52 ms
·
571.
▲
by
saurik
2y ago
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8429627/ > Nano-hydroxyapatite accelerates vascular calcification via lysosome impairment and autophagy dysfunction in smooth muscle cells
572.
▲
by
saurik
2y ago
If a video doesn't have source code, then it can't be open source. Likewise, if you feel that an LLM doesn't have source code because of some property of what it is -- as you claim it isn't software and somehow that mean
573.
▲
by
saurik
2y ago
I didn't claim the output is source code, any more than the kernel is. Are you sure you don't simply agree with me?
574.
▲
by
saurik
2y ago
genai.orchid.com (Note: I am not just affiliated with this company, but am "in charge of technology" for it... however, I haven't actually used this demo we are building, except to understand how to better generalize it into
575.
▲
by
saurik
2y ago
The thing they are pointing at and which is the thing people want is the output of the training engine, not the inputs. This is like someone saying they have an open source kernel, but they only release a compiler and a binary... the kernel
576.
▲
by
saurik
2y ago
Then what is the "source"? If we are to use the term "source" then what does that mean here, as distinct from it merely being free?
577.
▲
by
saurik
2y ago
I honestly can't tell which part you think wasn't normal. Other people have kind of poked back at what you are saying, but I feel without really questioning which part of this you don't like, as it kind of sounds as if you ar
578.
▲
by
saurik
2y ago
Just in case there are people who didn't have this thought but would want to know: a Google Shopping search for "2-deoxy-D-ribose" finds results (though do be careful to ignore any non-explicitly-2-deoxy- supplements).
579.
▲
by
saurik
2y ago
Most of the bidets--even super cheap basic ones--have a mode where they can flow water over the nozzle to clean it off. Regardless: if you shoot clean water through the nozzle you are momentarily maybe going to send dirty water at your alre
580.
▲
by
saurik
2y ago
Which is really annoying, and makes a ton of templated code in C++ have have to bifurcate on void unnecessarily. They already let me do return f(); in a void function if f also returns void... they should let me declare a variable of type v
581.
▲
by
saurik
2y ago
> I’m all for successful businesses operating within the parameters of the law, but is it not also correct to expect some adherence to a minimum ethical standard? A corporation doesn't have morality and can't exhibit ethics: th
582.
▲
by
saurik
2y ago
I mean, "GitHub" itself is the same problem, as is their libgit2 library, and that whole morass is now also owned by Microsoft, who probably feels like they deserve it.
583.
▲
by
saurik
2y ago
But... I am, surely, not advocating for people using <b> now: I'm merely lamenting that we allocated a one-character tag for <b> and then resorted to a five-character tag for <strong>, as it affects the readability (I
584.
▲
by
saurik
2y ago
Huh ... the documentation there for i is actually even more interesting to me: it seems like I'm actually actively "not supposed to be" (at least anymore, if ever) using em for almost every reason I've ever used it?!
585.
▲
by
saurik
2y ago
I am not complaining that it is "strong" instead of "bold" or that we have two separate tags, and I'd be perfectly happy if bold had never existed: certainly, if I actually wanted to use <b>, it isn't l
586.
▲
by
saurik
2y ago
It counts <object> but not <param>?
587.
▲
by
saurik
2y ago
(edit: Multiple people have interpreted this comment in a way which makes them think I'm complaining about the semantics and one even seems to think I am "advocating for" using the wrong semantic... I am merely complaining ab
588.
▲
by
saurik
2y ago
The big difference is how it is organized to the users viewing it. My GitHub account is littered with old forks of repositories I created just to submit one line patches; and despite the pull request to a repository in some sense being data
589.
▲
by
saurik
2y ago
The problem comes as people start shoving more and more DRM around, whether it be Google Play Protect, the new Android WebView Media Integrity API, or an eventual reboot of the Web Environment Integrity proposal.
590.
▲
by
saurik
2y ago
FWIW, I think the concern though is/was that for most of us who aren't doing shared-data multiprocessing this is going to make Python even slower; maybe they figured out how to avoid that?
591.
▲
by
saurik
2y ago
"If I don't do this morally bad thing, someone else will." can be used to justify almost doing any morally bad thing. Seriously: where do you draw the line on this? And even still: since when is "I can't stop it&quo
592.
▲
by
saurik
2y ago
I am really confused by one part of your blog post: it says that you had to embed Lwip as applications don't send/receive IP packets... but you also describe this as x86 virtualization running specifically-Linux, and Linux absolut
593.
▲
by
saurik
2y ago
Are we sure "OS" here meant "open source"? I read the comment you are replying to as "operating system"--particularly within the context that the project being discussed is Mbed OS--and when I started reading y
594.
▲
by
saurik
2y ago
Which, FWIW, are almost never written using recursion: they are written with either imperative loops or the moral equivalent of a goto statement.
595.
▲
by
saurik
2y ago
Why should I need Internet/cloud to get something as basic as encryption?
596.
▲
by
saurik
2y ago
My favorite version of this sentiment is also the earliest one I know of -- even beating the SMBC comic linked by others here by an additional half a year -- by Alex Krokus, in no small part as it doesn't fall into this trap of talking
597.
▲
by
saurik
2y ago
From the documentation I found for kSecAttrAccessibleAfterFirstUnlockThisDeviceOnly, it sounds like what you are doing here is explicitly opting out of support for the usual secure mechanisms Apple users have to back up their device--such a
598.
▲
by
saurik
2y ago
Why must responsibility be with one party or the other? To me, it feels pretty obvious that both the executives and the engineers are to blame! Just because someone is paying you to do something, that doesn't automatically make it mo
599.
▲
by
saurik
2y ago
Three days ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40860135
600.
▲
by
saurik
2y ago
I'm sorry; you think people don't complain about Rust? There are tons of articles posted here from people complaining about Rust in various ways. Bjarne wasn't saying whether most people like it... that's orthogonal: I a
More ›