Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
saulapremium
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
3 ms
·
1.
▲
by
saulapremium
5d ago
>Officially this was done out of concern for the safety of the French citizens. Gambling regulations exist in most places in the world, including the US. With good reason.
2.
▲
by
saulapremium
10d ago
Inflexibility was not the reason for Brexit. It happened because the British population was tricked by being fed misinformation about the EU for years by people like Nigel Farage and Boris Johnson. Little things like "The EU bans bendy
3.
▲
by
saulapremium
1mo ago
>they tend to consist entirely of people that support banning non-approved ..meanwhile, X is owned by such a person.
4.
▲
by
saulapremium
2mo ago
>If nobody was trusting the country, the economy would collapse. Trust is a complex term. You can work and trade with parties you don't trust, like so many countries do already. But a process has definitely begun, and it will withou
5.
▲
by
saulapremium
2mo ago
The Hunter corruption scandal is to the current administration as a drop of water is to a swimming pool. But I have no doubt that you can go on.
6.
▲
by
saulapremium
2mo ago
..freedom of the press?
7.
▲
by
saulapremium
3mo ago
>Anything political, I always go to Grok first. Why would you talk to an LLM about anything political?
8.
▲
by
saulapremium
3mo ago
With that line of thinking, you can attribute any ideology to a time period and declare it invalid today. Professor Jason Stanley who has written two books about the topic calls the current US administration fascist. Similar with professor
9.
▲
by
saulapremium
3mo ago
It sounds like you are trying to both-sides away the fact that Trump (or "Trump 2", if you insist) is an outlier here. US support for Israel has been pretty invariant over the years but nobody went along with Bibi's wet dream
10.
▲
by
saulapremium
4mo ago
My view is even gloomier. They won't have to coerce you, because with everything they know about you and human psychology, they will be able to manipulate you effectively enough for whatever they want.
11.
▲
by
saulapremium
4mo ago
This assumes that they believe two things which I don't think they do: 1. that the US is the only place where this will be developed, and 2. that the government will be able to handle this better than anyone else.
12.
▲
by
saulapremium
4mo ago
I am European and I am all too aware that the trend exists here as well. I am just hoping that a majority will now be able to see what disasters that road can lead to.
13.
▲
by
saulapremium
4mo ago
>No real counter argument, no evidence, just - "you are wrong". You presented no argument yourself, just a broad "denial". Which is, as GP said, is wrong. I am sure plenty of people are in denial but plenty are well a
14.
▲
by
saulapremium
4mo ago
Elon Musk, by his own words, would be in prison if the Democrats had won. It seems to me that he got exactly what he wanted.
15.
▲
by
saulapremium
4mo ago
Direct advertising is not the only factor you need to consider. Many powers had been doing political radicalization for years through many channels, including foreign sponsored ones.
16.
▲
by
saulapremium
4mo ago
Elon Musk donated a lot of money and among many other things, his companies avoided investigations. The fact that neither Trump or Putin have any loyalty doesn't negate the fact that money buys you tremendous power.
17.
▲
by
saulapremium
4mo ago
No, that is not always the result, very far from it. You seem to believe that society is just the natural state of things, and "government" is almost just in the way. It's an incredible blindness to the privilege you enjoy.
18.
▲
by
saulapremium
4mo ago
>Kindness REQUIRES two living beings, one to give and one to receive. If there is no receiver, there is no kindness. I guess, in some pendantic interpretation, but that doesn't seem relevant. Whether I am "practicing" or &
19.
▲
by
saulapremium
4mo ago
>Trump is the populist candidate elected to put the US back on competitive economic footing The US is (and was when he was elected) something of an economic miracle, so if that was the reason, it was certainly misguided. The one economic
20.
▲
by
saulapremium
4mo ago
>No offense Uh huh..
21.
▲
by
saulapremium
4mo ago
I absolute abhor the man but I think this is silly. No doubt that he has had luck and help, but he is still a good businessman. He's certainly an asshole (almost certainly dark triad territory), but I think that can be a benefit when c
22.
▲
by
saulapremium
5mo ago
..maybe? I mean, I would have said something exactly like that a few years ago. But first of all, history is full of atrocities committed by humans. They may all have considered themselves good people, but if they were/are objectively
23.
▲
by
saulapremium
5mo ago
I think the viral quote "Dear America: You are waking up, as Germany once did, to the awareness that 1/3 of your people would kill another 1/3, while 1/3 watches." is probably pretty apt. The IRGC also has real supp
24.
▲
by
saulapremium
5mo ago
Oh it's flagged as well, and I admit that it was low effort. But your comment served no purpose besides from provocation, and I guess it worked.
25.
▲
by
saulapremium
6mo ago
It's funny how excited you are about BlueSky, a place that I would imagine you don't go? But somehow you know all about it?
26.
▲
by
saulapremium
6mo ago
No, that is the obvious and clear truth. MAGA has done a pretty good job at making the opposite appear true, though.
27.
▲
by
saulapremium
6mo ago
I am not suggesting that the IRGC has gained popularity , I am suggesting that they are emboldened , and conversely that the population is discouraged. >they are relatively unbothtered I mean, obviously, Trumps word is worth about as
28.
▲
by
saulapremium
6mo ago
>It is really hard for me to see how any of this has made the IRGC more stable in the long run. It's not hard for me to see. It's very similar to the situation in Ukraine. They have suffered losses but I can only imagine that t
29.
▲
by
saulapremium
6mo ago
"Even you"? Are you someone who would be inclined to look into something like that?
30.
▲
by
saulapremium
6mo ago
it says that playing by the rules means losing work when the other party doesn't.
More ›