sat

3 ms·

1.
by sat 12y ago
Well, I was just comparing Java - a complied, strictly typed languages to another in the same domain - Go. Scripting and interpreted languages like python, ruby are a different thing altogether. I agree with you that ruby/rails or pyth
2.
by sat 12y ago
Struct embedding is just syntactic sugar. Have you tried using reflection to look at the fields of the struct? You don't have a chance of looking that the embedded field properties as if they were truly embedded (flattened out as in in
3.
by sat 12y ago
Here is a competition. I'd write in Java and you can write in go. Lets crank out a simple ToDo CRUD application. Any bet who will finish faster? This is not to say go is bad at all. Its been designed by people 1000x smarter than me. Bu
4.
by sat 12y ago
I attempted not to. What pulls me back is the fact that I am trying to force go to help me reuse data structures I already have (without turning to reflection everytime or manually typecasting).
5.
by sat 12y ago
>> bloated IntelliJ and the vim plugin as my only option Bloated it may be but helps me get the job done faster...much faster than I can do it in vim. I work on a mac with 16 GB RAM and thats sufficient for lots of processes. Every b
6.
by sat 12y ago
Embedding won't give you a flattened structure with transparency you expect. In other words struct B embedded in struct A will only create a syntactic sugar so that you can access properties of B through A. It won't work in other
7.
by sat 12y ago
Seriously, in good faith, I attempted to learn and write a simple web application in go. I found it hard coming from a world where IDE support was available in other languages that do autocompletion and things like that and development just