sardinaconsal

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by sardinaconsal 8y ago

   I think that at the core of this problem is: 1.) Separate evaluation is done in absolute terms. 2.) Join evaluation is done in relative terms in a specific model. Which specific model? The model that only takes into account the union of f
2. 2.▲
   by sardinaconsal 8y ago

   The best solution I can think of to tackle this problem is to design a probabilistic model that include a confidence level for future risk and payment for k&r, if the risk is increased the maximal payment is decreased in such a way that
3. 3.▲
   by sardinaconsal 8y ago

   This problem could be related to asymmetric information. In case that a huge converage of K&R is known you become a valuable target for kidnappers so the cost of the coverage should increase, so if the coverage is known the insurance co
4. 4.▲
   by sardinaconsal 8y ago

   I think that answers is equivalent to the company not convering ransom and kidnapping, is the employee who establish and pay such coverage. So technically is a different problem.
5. 5.▲
   by sardinaconsal 8y ago

   I think is not possible, because the purpose of such legal measure is to avoid increasing ransom and kidnapping, and that would happen if the criminals knew that they would get the ransom from the coverage company. Hence any way to prove t