Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
saratv
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
1.
▲
by
saratv
6y ago
Sassbook AI Summarizer uses state-of-the-art AI to generate automatic summaries of text documents. The default mode is "Abstractive" which is equivalent to how humans summarize. There is also the more traditional "Extractive&
2.
▲
Show HN: Sassbook AI Summarizer–Summarize text like a human with AI
(sassbook.com)
1 points
by
saratv
6y ago
|
1 comments
3.
▲
by
saratv
6y ago
This is way cool, yet violent!
4.
▲
by
saratv
7y ago
Obviously we disagree. Sassbook only generates completions that help the writer to express themselves. It serves to augment human capabilities and bring automation at a higher level that word-level auto-complete. There are far more legitima
5.
▲
by
saratv
7y ago
Both on the general quality of generations as well as segmentation. We are still figuring out the priorities and domains. Do you have any thoughts/suggestions?
6.
▲
by
saratv
7y ago
Agree, and this is in general an issue with lots of "deep learning" AI technology. The models are trained on huge amounts of text in the public domain and biases often leak into them. This is an active research area and we will ac
7.
▲
by
saratv
7y ago
Note that the generations aren't expected to be factually correct, but rather provides a possible completion, which may be edited for originality and correctness.
8.
▲
by
saratv
7y ago
Thanks for trying and some profound thoughts around it! Yes, we do learn from our surroundings and at an early stage in our lives. Nothing is totally novel. However, the AI is intended to augment than replace and sometimes enhance our capab
9.
▲
by
saratv
7y ago
Thanks for the feedback! Yes, the SaaS does rely on state-of-the-art NLG. I don't know why you think they are far better if we are using them as is. I am not offended at all; just curious where that big difference is. Who says one can&
10.
▲
by
saratv
7y ago
At this time, the engine has no knowledge about your context (blogging etc.). It picks up completions matching the topic and style. I understand that you find this odd since you are not composing a Reddit post. Again, very useful feedback;
11.
▲
by
saratv
7y ago
If you are talking about recent AI ones, should generally comparable favorably and should be better in some contexts (rather limited at this time). We are a new startup, so hope to move ahead and stay ahead. If you have experience with othe
12.
▲
by
saratv
7y ago
Apologies for that. The server issues are now fixed. Thanks for (re) trying.
13.
▲
by
saratv
7y ago
Apologies for that. The server issues are now fixed. Thanks for (re) trying.
14.
▲
by
saratv
7y ago
Apologies for that. This should be fixed now.
15.
▲
by
saratv
7y ago
Reddit is a source for the corpus, so it is likely that the style matches it. More likely for some topics/styles than others. Do you feel it somehow affects the quality of generations? Thanks for the feedback. It'd be great if you
16.
▲
by
saratv
7y ago
I won't rule it out completely. AI works by training on a large corpus of data, so some of that will be reflected in generated text. However, the algorithm does not copy stuff verbatim from the corpus, but uses its "learning"
17.
▲
by
saratv
7y ago
Agreed ;-( Thanks for trying. BTW, you could just delete and retry and you might end up with a better completion. It is expected to create different generations on each attempt where possible.
18.
▲
by
saratv
7y ago
Apologies for that. Fixed it by adding more servers. Thanks for taking a look.
19.
▲
by
saratv
7y ago
Also, each time you hit "Complete" or "Continue" a new completion is likely to be generated.
20.
▲
by
saratv
7y ago
Thanks for trying it out and providing valuable feedback! Could you please try hitting the "Continue" button? Since the first generation was reasonable, you could just continue until the generation starts to veer off. A new promp
21.
▲
by
saratv
7y ago
That wouldn't be something that could be considered "to the extent reasonably needed to operate and provide the Services to you". There is no such intent anyway. I'll review it with the lawyer and revise it to something
22.
▲
by
saratv
7y ago
Thanks a lot for trying and providing feedback! Each time you click complete, a different completion is usually generated, so that is one thing you could try. Also provide a longer prompt (30-40 words is ideal) to express your intent more c
23.
▲
by
saratv
7y ago
Thanks in advance for feedback and suggestions for improvement. You can try it out freely.
24.
▲
Show HN: Sassbook AI writer – Create text content rapidly using AI
(sassbook.com)
61 points
by
saratv
7y ago
|
50 comments
25.
▲
by
saratv
7y ago
Cool. Perhaps add revisions too to avoid losing all work when shared.
26.
▲
by
saratv
7y ago
Good one!I suppose the insights apply to not just bootstrapped businesses. Great clarity of thought.
27.
▲
by
saratv
7y ago
How does this compare to Apify?
28.
▲
by
saratv
7y ago
Interesting use of generative technologies
29.
▲
by
saratv
7y ago
Looking for feedback and any advice you may have. Thanks!
30.
▲
Show HN: Sassbook-Create text content much faster; have fun too (Just launched)
(sassbook.com)
2 points
by
saratv
7y ago
|
1 comments
More ›