sanity

8 ms·

91.
by sanity 6mo ago
I think this is mostly right, but it depends a bit on how you frame "fairness". The system isn’t trying to impose a notion of fairness from the outside. It’s trying to find agreements that both parties prefer over their BATNA (i.e
92.
by sanity 6mo ago
Thank you! It's early days yet but I've had interest from people going through a divorce with child separation questions - however I wanted to ensure it worked well on less serious problems before I risk it on something so consequ
93.
by sanity 6mo ago
Thank you for sharing these. This feels complementary to my approach. Your papers seem focused on tone, interventions, and guiding the conversation. My approach is more about trying to infer each party’s preferences and then search for agre
94.
by sanity 6mo ago
Thank you. Yes, you could inflate your BATNA, but then you risk the other side rejecting the agreement when a mutually beneficial agreement was possible if you had been honest. This kind of property in a negotiation system, where honesty is
95.
by sanity 6mo ago
Thank you. The purpose of having the LLM interview the user is to try to surface those unstated preferences by exploring aspects of the agreement that the user may not surface themselves.
96.
by sanity 6mo ago
You raise a good point. The issue is presentation - leading with the 60/40 reads like midpoint arbitration, whereas the interesting part is Daniel's path back to 50/50, the management salary, the mutual waiver on the first 18
97.
by sanity 6mo ago
You are correct that Nash should address this because only the relative utilities matter, not absolute. There is the potential for parties to get better deals by overstating their BATNAs, but then they risk the other party rejecting the agr
98.
by sanity 6mo ago
Believe it or not I did a lot of testing with geopolitics early on but didn't want to put it on the website so people wouldn't think I'm a megalomaniac ;) I regenerated the Israel/Palestine agreement using my latest code
99.
by sanity 6mo ago
Thank you! You should definitely get a lawyer to review any agreement before signing if there is meaningful money at stake.
100.
by sanity 6mo ago
John Nash was indeed a great man, thank you!
101.
by sanity 6mo ago
Thank you for the feedback. The goal of the Nash bargaining solution is to find the agreement that maximizes the likelihood that most parties will agree based on their stated preferences.
102.
by sanity 6mo ago
Thank you! You're right about the "How it works" page - I will remove it.
103.
by sanity 6mo ago
Hi, what happens when you try?
104.
by sanity 6mo ago
Thank you!
105.
by sanity 6mo ago
Thank you!
106.
by sanity 6mo ago
Hey, thank you for the feedback, if you click on the profile icon in the top right there is a "Sign Out" option. We don't have a delete account option yet but I will prioritize it.
107.
Show HN: Mediator.ai – Using Nash bargaining and LLMs to systematize fairness(mediator.ai)
160 points by sanity 6mo ago|74 comments
108.
by sanity 8mo ago
Hi, thanks for the thoughtful questions. You’re right that data remains in Freenet only as long as people are actively interacting with or hosting it. After that, it may eventually be removed. The key point is that Freenet is a communicatio
109.
by sanity 8mo ago
I gave this talk on the current-generation Freenet: a ground-up redesign focused on real-time decentralized applications rather than a static datastore. Happy to answer questions.
110.
Show HN: Freenet Lives – Real-Time Decentralized Apps at Scale [video](youtube.com)
6 points by sanity 8mo ago|3 comments
111.
Show HN: How to build decentralized apps on the new Freenet(freenet.org)
3 points by sanity 9mo ago|0 comments
112.
by sanity 9mo ago
A quote like what - saying it's a bad idea to hang around people who hate you because of your skin color? The only people frothing about the mouth over it are people who hate him over politics, it's a convenient gotcha - nothing m
113.
by sanity 9mo ago
Using a sockpuppet account is hardly the crime of the century. If that's your worst criticism of him then he's doing very well.
114.
by sanity 9mo ago
Sounds like a club I'm happy to be part of.
115.
by sanity 9mo ago
I think people should be selected for roles based on merit, not skin color. If that results in more or less people of any given demographic in any given role I'm fine with it - provided that they got there through merit. Do you disagre
116.
by sanity 9mo ago
If you spoke extemporaneously for an hour a day, every day, for years, and people went hunting for the most awkward or easily misinterpreted clip, I’m confident they’d find weird shit too.
117.
by sanity 9mo ago
You're making my point for me.
118.
by sanity 9mo ago
Or perhaps it was killed due to DEI but he didn't feel comfortable being honest about it at the time because there is a powerful taboo against white men claiming discrimination.
119.
by sanity 9mo ago
My moral stance is abhorrent to about 7% of the population who the other 93% want nothing to do with. I'll get over it.
120.
by sanity 9mo ago
You’re treating disagreement as evidence of moral failure, then using that to retroactively justify the label. That’s not reasoning — it’s tribal sorting. You must exist in quite a bubble, a rapidly shrinking one.

More ›