4 ms·
You’re treating disagreement as evidence of moral failure, then using that to retroactively justify the label. That’s not reasoning — it’s tribal sorting. You m
by sanity 9mo ago
You’re treating disagreement as evidence of moral failure, then using that to retroactively justify the label. That’s not reasoning — it’s tribal sorting. You must exist in quite a bubble, a rapidly shrinking one.
- amrocha 9mo agoYou have the causality backwards. Your moral stance is abhorrent, therefore I disagree with you and want nothing to do with you. Not the other way around.
- sanity 9mo agoMy moral stance is abhorrent to about 7% of the population who the other 93% want nothing to do with. I'll get over it.
- DonHopkins 9mo agoYou've been listening to too much Fox News and Trump Truth Social posts if you think 93% of the population is bigoted racists.
- Capricorn2481 9mo agoYou can't dismiss other people's assessment of your politics just because they are different from yours. That makes no sense.