sandeepkd

8 ms·

151.
by sandeepkd 3mo ago
I would highly recommend using ORM's, with the caveat to know exactly when not to use them. Startups do not fall in that bucket. 1. Most of these advices are unfortunately impractical and incomplete for startups. A good Data Model is h
152.
by sandeepkd 3mo ago
LLM is not hacking itself, its a PR spin if anything. LLM is an input output system, there is no more hacking than that. What gets abused or hacked is how the input is parsed, validated to guard certain information (training data). Security
153.
by sandeepkd 3mo ago
Works just fine, you have to get the one with NFC
154.
by sandeepkd 3mo ago
I am an engineer and have some insights on the discussions and developments around it. ITS NOT SIMPLE AT ALL 1. The idea was to provide a phishing resistant authentication method for enterprise users (companies loose quite a lot of money to
155.
by sandeepkd 3mo ago
Security exists in multiple layers. CVEs do not make a system vulnerable by default, there has to be a way to exploit them. Questions one can ask, is your system connected to internet, what does your fire wall looks like, which ports are op
156.
by sandeepkd 3mo ago
>That capability alone could hack half the US. This almost seems like believing in magic. What really has happened is you have collected all the hacking/abuse/malicious flows/code in one place. Greedy or A* algorithms have
157.
by sandeepkd 3mo ago
Simplicity is relative from where I see things in a particular domain. Security does not have any direct ROI on it, the security engineers are hired way too late in the game when all the stack is almost buried in deep decisions. The concept
158.
by sandeepkd 3mo ago
Based on my limited understanding what it translates to is - Its a simple infrastructure security issue, instead of taking the responsibility for being lackluster with security they are just giving it a PR spin story. Resembles a lot with m
159.
by sandeepkd 3mo ago
In the absence of concrete examples its hard to say what is OP trying to optimize for. Optimism is good, however at the end of the day everything is a trade off, the cost has to be paid for all decisions. A good design is all about optimizi
160.
by sandeepkd 3mo ago
> leadership Not sure if its just me, lately I have started feeling pretty offensive about the increased usage of the word. Its management not leadership by any means. > "leadership encourages this because from what they can tell
161.
by sandeepkd 3mo ago
> as per benchmarks That seems to be the key and its risky when the measure becomes the target itself. When you already know the benchmarks, and that drives the definition of success outcome then there is every incentive to just chase th
162.
by sandeepkd 3mo ago
This is an interesting topic in itself, pretty much applies to all shared spaces. The security challenge is somewhat solvable with shared (tenant based) databases, I am more worried about the noisy neighbor problem. Its really easy to write
163.
by sandeepkd 3mo ago
My guess is these AI companies are counting on the money to come from traditional SAAS style services only. This whole AI would be used to gather enough capital to rewrite most of the existing SAAS services under one umbrella, sort of supe
164.
by sandeepkd 3mo ago
any concrete evidences to support this theory from the past 12 months would be helpful here (where evidence > marketing fluff)
165.
by sandeepkd 3mo ago
If the goal of a trademark is to get recognized then its futile given OpenAI is already popular. If the goal is to prevent others from using the term which is so generic then it does makes sense to not allow the common keywords being hijack
166.
by sandeepkd 3mo ago
Should a company promoting the enterprise usability of AI, itself start with building a intake process to distinguish between the noise and signal for these reports. If you cant solve your own problems with your product then how do you expe
167.
by sandeepkd 3mo ago
So all the smart people are letting a script being executed on their machines where the execution of the script is controlled/managed by a remote machine. Wait, isnt that a definition of a malware??
168.
by sandeepkd 3mo ago
In other words centralization of the power is most risky end game here
169.
by sandeepkd 3mo ago
> The problem with Flock is not who owns the data The one who owns the data is the one who should be responsible to provide proper guardrails in certain cases if not all, specially like these ones. It comes down to the fine line around b
170.
by sandeepkd 3mo ago
Not being able to prove is one thing, pretending it may not be the case is next level of positivity. There are definitely going to be pockets of hard working smart folks in every place, however the company as a whole would get a bad name ev
171.
by sandeepkd 3mo ago
Its just a normal letter containing the details on what to expect, its more of a heads-up than a shake down to me. If the billing information is not there and account still continue to use the feature then the account would be disabled or s
172.
by sandeepkd 3mo ago
Most of the companies built with VC money in a MVP style fit in the criteria. The more I think about it, I feel at this point its more about the focus on business problem being solved than engineering (how its solved) which leads to this. T
173.
by sandeepkd 3mo ago
People are generally really smart and resourceful. Specially the ones on the hacking side, boils down to whats available to take advantage of.
174.
by sandeepkd 3mo ago
Decentralization is not really a feasible option when you have more than one actors. Either you embed the centralization from beginning with some good and verifiable contracts or a certain majority is going to hijack the platform and act as
175.
by sandeepkd 3mo ago
The LLMs are beautiful if anything, a lot of creative and hard work has been poured into building them. They take the natural language to the next level and all that was engineering part. It has its own usefulness subjective to areas. The b
176.
by sandeepkd 3mo ago
I was under impression that I understand networking and DNS resolution. It was really hard to follow, the OP did worked hard, just not sure what exact problem was being solved with the proposed solution that isnt already been solved.
177.
by sandeepkd 3mo ago
My perception of real problem is that the LLMs were generic purpose tool and the focus was to improve their information retrieval and prediction. And they were fed with all this data (including private with was otherwise not available to ev
178.
by sandeepkd 3mo ago
Call me pessimistic or realistic, the code and architecture is just a reflection of the author/organization. The only way it can change/improve is if you either switch the people/organization or invest in their improvement&#x
179.
by sandeepkd 3mo ago
Wondering whats the end game with this, it does not really benefits Anthropic much other than bad PR is its true
180.
by sandeepkd 3mo ago
This seems like a easy way to get into consulting. Once you deliver the code back to the owners they are going to do the vibe coding again on the top whatever refactored code you get back. In other words it can become a perpetual cycle.

More ›