samrus

20 ms·

481.
by samrus 1y ago
It didnt maintain the course. It kept going at a t intersection and ploughed into another car
482.
by samrus 1y ago
Thats last part is either naive or just shilling. The problems isnt the cogs, its the business owners setting up the incentives. Providing reasoned support is expensive from a time and effort perspective, so they dont invest in it. Service
483.
by samrus 1y ago
This only works if manufacturing coke back to the US is there a way to track the progress on that btw? Like a dashboard or something to show the number of machinists being hired, average salary for a machinist, maybe a volume weighted avera
484.
by samrus 1y ago
If they're targeting and killing people, then they arent really just settlers anymore, they're combatants
485.
by samrus 1y ago
This is elitist. Language is descriptive not prescriptive
486.
by samrus 1y ago
Changing plans? They could just keep the old plans and add a new one, like OAIs 2k/month plan
487.
by samrus 1y ago
For NASA? I dont see why not. Unless they were doing something related to natsec
488.
by samrus 1y ago
No the public is the customer. The difference is between the postal service being profitable and not losing your packages. If not losing packages costs too much for them to be profitable, then the public would want them to operate at a cost
489.
by samrus 1y ago
It might be shilling, but it might also be someone just putting out low effort content to get traffic I was actually referring more to what could be wrong with the code that they would want to hide?
490.
by samrus 1y ago
Why?
491.
by samrus 1y ago
I mean thats true for all DL layers, but we talk about convolutions and stuff often enough. Embedding are relatively new but theres not alot of discussion as to how crazy they are, especially given that they are the real star of the LLM, wi
492.
by samrus 1y ago
Maybe cosine similarity isnt the sulver bullet, but going back to the point: why dont LLM embedding spaces suffer from the curse of dimensionality?
493.
by samrus 1y ago
I highly doubt it. If someone comes in and claims to be an account holder for a multi billioniare (even a non-famous one) i promise you the banks gonna go through alot more hoops to make sure its the right person. Its only woth the proles t
494.
by samrus 1y ago
This isnt the same thing. This is leveraging inheritance. The mathutils example isnt. If the example is supposed to include cases where inheritance is being used and the parent classes methods are important to the child class functioning, t
495.
by samrus 1y ago
Screwing over regular people didnt work out too well for that one guy though ...
496.
by samrus 1y ago
Efficiency is important for public institutions but not the highest priority. The highest priority is public service. These institutions should have public good as their north star, not shareholder value
497.
by samrus 1y ago
I understand wanting to make the organization more efficient, but i don't think this is what's happening here. I think this is the classic republican strat of gutting federal agencies, pointing to the inefficiencies caused by the
498.
by samrus 1y ago
The examples provided here cant be real, right? Like look at the MathUtils one. No one is so braindead that they would add 2 redundant lines on top of their function def right?
499.
by samrus 1y ago
Thats like saying why should kodak focus on digital cameras. Intel could throw its muscle behind RISC-V and beat the other big boys there
500.
by samrus 1y ago
> Rumors are, that Cook doesn’t even use a Mac day to day. This has to be false. Your telling me the CEO of apple is using windows 11? With ads in the start menu? Thatd be hilarious
501.
by samrus 1y ago
Yeah but there arent alot of people like steve jobs out there. Despite what these CEOs think
502.
by samrus 1y ago
Chatgpt thought it fit
503.
by samrus 1y ago
Thats fine. Great even. But thats just normal nueral net inference. Why mention agentic AI over just AI? The gpu doesnt care if the inference is being done for object detection or chain of thought. Intel can only make gpus, their products d
504.
by samrus 1y ago
There is none. Thats what im saying. There is literally no difference to the gpu between running a nueral network for a normal LLM and for agentic AI.
505.
by samrus 1y ago
No im saying that agnetic AI itself is software. The parts that require hardware is just the neural network. The agentic part is all in software. So how does intel focus on agentic AI beyond just making better datacenter gpus? That like a f
506.
by samrus 1y ago
I think thays fine. Thats within the spirit of FOSS. The issue has always been companies demanding fixes because it affects their users, and those companies cant afford to wait. So now they can pay to have the devs spend a bit more time to
507.
by samrus 1y ago
They dont charge for the source. They charge for paying more attention to your issues, and for compiling the code for you. If you compile it yourself and do some of the work to resolve the issues (planning or an outright PR) then you wont p
508.
by samrus 1y ago
> As an open source project no one is forcing you to maintain it. Sure but thats not the spirit that built the modern software world. Our globabl information infrastructure heavily heavily relies on OSS and that has open source devs assu
509.
by samrus 1y ago
Agentic AI? How exactly does a chip manufacturer focus on agentic AI? Thats software. How does riding that hype bubble help them male better chips?
510.
by samrus 1y ago
Maybe the designated fun thread isnt a good fit for you

More ›