saltysalt

8 ms·

121.
The Return of the Artisans(techleader.pro)
4 points by saltysalt 1y ago|0 comments
122.
Cashless societies are deeply impersonal [video](youtube.com)
3 points by saltysalt 1y ago|0 comments
123.
Will AI Slop Kill the Internet? [video](youtube.com)
3 points by saltysalt 1y ago|5 comments
124.
AI is the new outsourcing [video](youtube.com)
1 points by saltysalt 1y ago|0 comments
125.
by saltysalt 1y ago
I love Hetzner, I run my Internet search engine from there: bare metal FTW.
126.
Social media now main source of news in US, research suggests(bbc.com)
8 points by saltysalt 1y ago|4 comments
127.
Leaders must not ignore alarms [video](youtube.com)
2 points by saltysalt 1y ago|0 comments
128.
Use of Weapons(foliosociety.com)
5 points by saltysalt 1y ago|0 comments
129.
by saltysalt 1y ago
Great news antirez, well done!
130.
by saltysalt 2y ago
Completely agree! We already had a perfectly good protocol for content federation.
131.
by saltysalt 2y ago
I've hosted an RSS feed on my blog for 20 years, in the vain hope that it is still being consumed by someone. I think the only use case keeping RSS alive is podcast feeds.
132.
by saltysalt 2y ago
I miss RSS.
133.
by saltysalt 2y ago
Thanks for the OS recommendations! I'm a soon to be ex-Synology user looking for a new home (their killing of Video Station also irked me).
134.
by saltysalt 2y ago
Strongly agree. It's fascinating to me how faster broadband and selfie cameras led to more slop content.
135.
by saltysalt 2y ago
Indeed! Ultimately, all online business models end at ad click revenue.
136.
by saltysalt 2y ago
You should try addressing my original question, rather than deflecting with yours. Have you provided any evidence of their independence? But you clearly can't. I give up.
137.
by saltysalt 2y ago
Great article! It is hard to see an ROI on OpenAI at this stage, or indeed a sustainable business model based on revenue rather than investment.
138.
Amid Trump tariff chaos, Nvidia launches AI chip production on US soil(arstechnica.com)
10 points by saltysalt 2y ago|0 comments
139.
by saltysalt 2y ago
Asking questions is how we learn. If I disagreed, I would have wrote that instead.
140.
by saltysalt 2y ago
But I have looked at their evidence in the article. I then done a web search to learn more about Airparif, who leads them (and their resumes), who funds them etc. because I never heard of them (I am not French). I have literally done my own
141.
by saltysalt 2y ago
Your point is deflection. Why don't you provide evidence that Airparif is independent instead, to address my original question? I'll wait.
142.
by saltysalt 2y ago
Yes they can be right, I agree. Also I never stated I disagreed with them. I simply questioned their independence. Let me give you another hypothetical example: Would you trust a report on the impacts of fracking by a pro-fracking NGO, with
143.
by saltysalt 2y ago
Because the source is important, to understand the motives. Don't you agree?
144.
by saltysalt 2y ago
I am under no such obligation.
145.
by saltysalt 2y ago
Both are true: 1. You can question the source of evidence and funding. 2. If you do, you are not automatically required to provide alternative sources. Nobody on this thread has addressed my OP directly, but have instead jumped to point 2.
146.
by saltysalt 2y ago
I'm not judging them for choosing to use public transport or bicycles, that's their right. They should not judge car drivers, but they often do and want them banned. The secret to successful urban living is tolerance, but sadly th
147.
by saltysalt 2y ago
Why judge others for how they live, when you don't even know their circumstances?
148.
by saltysalt 2y ago
You are completely correct about the bias on HN against cars: that will change when they get older and have kids. Not everyone is a young single urbanite working remotely or downtown.
149.
by saltysalt 2y ago
Sigh, I already addressed this demand that I MUST name an alternative in this thread. It's deflection pure and simple, I'm not going over that again...
150.
by saltysalt 2y ago
I simply questioned the independence of the source of the evidence, is such critical thinking not allowed? Your attempt to somehow make me responsible to provide an alternative source of evidence is classic deflection. That is not my respon

More ›