3 ms·
Sigh, I already addressed this demand that I MUST name an alternative in this thread. It's deflection pure and simple, I'm not going over that again...
by saltysalt 2y ago
Sigh, I already addressed this demand that I MUST name an alternative in this thread. It's deflection pure and simple, I'm not going over that again...
- stouset 2y agoIf you don’t think the current people doing this work or funding it are appropriate, you should be able to give at least a vague idea of an entity you think is better suited for either. The only qualification you managed to put out there is that they don’t have bias. This is literally unachievable and you know it, which is why you won’t even attempt to even hint at a better party.
- saltysalt 2y agoBoth are true: 1. You can question the source of evidence and funding. 2. If you do, you are not automatically required to provide alternative sources. Nobody on this thread has addressed my OP directly, but have instead jumped to point 2.