sahil50

9 ms·

31.
by sahil50 5y ago
Indeed. More detail here. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29915004 Perhaps the "dark matter" of a galaxy is the rest of the galaxies of the universe.
32.
by sahil50 5y ago
Because you care about tone, which is a good thing, please read about how Milgrom, McGaugh, and Kroupa have been treated by cold dark matter (CDM) establishment.
33.
by sahil50 5y ago
"stupid" is in reference to the invisible blobs of noninteracting kludge. "lost" is what I would say the people pumping it are.
34.
by sahil50 5y ago
Intelligent and good people have followed the advice above, and the result has been more error and harm. Therefore, learning from their experience, the one thing that works is accurately calling the status quo's invisible blobs of noni
35.
by sahil50 5y ago
It's actually a simpler concern. Literally, what is that account? Like what is it? Something that has no activity on HackerNews for 15 months, then first thing it says is rude and false.
36.
by sahil50 5y ago
Great pull quote. For people new to the Tully-Fisher relation, the essence of it is that at galactic scale, gravity is not like v^2/r = GM/r^2. It's more like v^2/r ~ sqrt(GM/r^2), so v^4 ~ M
37.
by sahil50 5y ago
- I already agree it is a debate. It has been a debate for 40 years ever since Moti Milgrom first proposed modified gravity (MOND). - I already was not surprised by the HackerNews crowd responding with hostility. - I am pointing the HackerN
38.
by sahil50 5y ago
The root observation is that galaxies and galaxy clusters are moving faster than expected, and holding together more strongly than expected.
39.
by sahil50 5y ago
fyi, I started my comment with fyi. The point being that the premise of the article is overblown. McGaugh says the same here https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/dark-matter-may-b... .
40.
by sahil50 5y ago
"armchair" and "no real credentials" fine if you want to call me an "amateur cosmologist with a few credentials"
41.
by sahil50 5y ago
The tweets above are good questions! This is how to do science! Meanwhile it's good to restate the obvious. Modified gravity (MOND), where acceleration at galactic scales isn't just GM/R^2 but modeled as sqrt(GM/R^2 * cH
42.
by sahil50 5y ago
http://astroweb.case.edu/ssm/mond/fit_compare.html cold dark matter (CDM) is a superimposed amorphous blob of invisible non-interacting matter, hence its inability to model the kinks in the real rotation curve mod
43.
by sahil50 5y ago
Related to your idea, - modified gravity (MOND), which accurately models the centripetal acceleration of stars in hundreds of galaxies, models acceleration as sqrt(GM/R^2 * cH/(2pi)) - cH/(2pi) = c^2 / (2pi * 13.8 bly),
44.
by sahil50 5y ago
Appreciate the feedback. These statements are a synthesis of ideas from people who've already synthesized all the complexity of the CDM vs MOND debate, but now I'm talking at the level of HackerNews so people do something!
45.
by sahil50 5y ago
I look back to where this started, and this started with Fritz Zwicky noticing that galaxies and galaxy clusters are moving faster than expected. This is the root observation. From there, a good question is "How do we model it?".
46.
by sahil50 5y ago
I have a degree in Computer Science from Yale. I built https://zedtime.live and I'm building https://spase.io , and I've been in direct communication with cold dark matter (CDM) and modified gravity (MOND) c
47.
by sahil50 5y ago
Yep 5th figure at that link. Also McGaugh's words here, https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/dark-matter-may-b... .
48.
by sahil50 5y ago
Hey, glad to meet you. Maybe we can have a discussion. Glad we agree on modified gravity (MOND) being able to accurately account for galaxy rotation. - galaxy clusters - lensing - Bullet Cluster, El Gordo all have answers in the work of mod
49.
by sahil50 5y ago
Answer on the 5th figure on this page. https://tritonstation.com/2022/01/10/the-curious-case-of-agc...
50.
by sahil50 5y ago
http://astroweb.case.edu/ssm/mond/fit_compare.html
51.
by sahil50 5y ago
fyi, "dark matter" is not a real thing. Modified gravity (MOND) accurately models galactic rotation for hundreds of galaxies with sqrt(GM/R^2 * c*H / 2pi), without the stupid and ludicrous idea of invisible, noninteracti
52.
Satoshi Nakamoto's Linguistic Quirks(drive.google.com)
3 points by sahil50 5y ago|0 comments
53.
Satoshi Nakamoto Linguistic Analysis(docs.google.com)
3 points by sahil50 5y ago|0 comments
54.
by sahil50 5y ago
Yep see the examples of source code for Zip2 and X.com and commentary from other engineers
55.
by sahil50 5y ago
Perfect clip, thx
56.
by sahil50 5y ago
I don't think Fridman asked the question in response to or while aware of this information above. And neither Elon.
57.
by sahil50 5y ago
Recapping the top 5 reasons - capability - will - linguistic similarity - call with chief of staff - Los Angeles IP address
58.
20 reasons Satoshi Nakamoto is Elon Musk(gist.github.com)
10 points by sahil50 5y ago|8 comments
59.
Satoshi's Leaked Los Angeles IP Address Near Elon Musk 2009 Residence(web.archive.org)
5 points by sahil50 5y ago|0 comments
60.
Satoshi Nakamoto and Elon Musk(medium.com)
2 points by sahil50 5y ago|0 comments

More ›