Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
saghm
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
181.
▲
by
saghm
1mo ago
I'd argue that you invented some sort of link between "performance of git" and "performance of websites" that is not at all a premise I accept either, so it's not that unreasonable for me to point out that I th
182.
▲
by
saghm
1mo ago
Fair enough! I think my meta-point still stands though; I don't see any fundamental reason to assume that an LLM wouldn't generate something similar to this without needing a ton of effort in prompting.
183.
▲
by
saghm
1mo ago
I can't say I agree with this is take; it's never occurred to me "how rude of this author of the tutorial not to plug their Twitter handle before teaching me the thing I came for". I have no reason to suspect this is fro
184.
▲
by
saghm
1mo ago
If the worst thing you can say about a git hosting provider is that the performance of their blog is worse than the performance of their git servers, I think they're probably doing an okay job.
185.
▲
by
saghm
1mo ago
All but one of my employers have used either Github or Gitlab, and at every one of them there were a litany of complaints about whichever one we were using. It's kind of surprising to me that someone might not immediately recognize tha
186.
▲
by
saghm
1mo ago
My relatively ignorant take is that it's pretty similar to Mercurial, except that it's compatible with git repos, which is also the answer to why it might get more traction. At least from my standpoint, it also doesn't need
187.
▲
by
saghm
1mo ago
I'd argue that the reason a lot of developers have not learned git in depth is because it's actually kind of terrible from a UX standpoint (lots of inconsistent naming of things and somewhat leaky abstractions), and that Mercurial
188.
▲
by
saghm
1mo ago
That's basically the point I was trying to make with my initial response; I think any claim that something is so urgent that we need to act now even with a solution that everyone admits isn't great should be scrutinized pretty t
189.
▲
by
saghm
1mo ago
If you think the big social media companies are literally bombarding kids with radiation, I'm confused why you still don't seem to consider it at least as urgent to shut down the radiation-generating companies.
190.
▲
by
saghm
1mo ago
Not at all evident from the story I told, but she had a stroke a few years ago and then only survived another year after that. She lived a long and from what I could tell happy and fulfilled life though, and to the end seemed far more conce
191.
▲
by
saghm
1mo ago
No disagreement here! My point is more that the bar for what's enough to be a safety issue in ads is actually extraordinarily low, which is exactly why I don't have any qualms about using the strictest measures possible to block a
192.
▲
by
saghm
1mo ago
I'd argue that any teenagers who go from having access today to not having it tomorrow are probably not going to magically become different in the ways you desire; it seems a lot more likely to have effects on kids who are younger and
193.
▲
by
saghm
1mo ago
Yeah, I feel like the actual solution here should be regulating the companies that are allegedly causing the harm, not the victims of said harm. It says a lot about someone if they think the solution to "this giant powerful entity is t
194.
▲
by
saghm
1mo ago
Right? If I had to come to with like, five problems that I felt like they were both urgent enough and and significant enough that we should literally implement the least bad policy immediately rather than do nothing until we come up with so
195.
▲
by
saghm
1mo ago
I don't agree with your framing at all that we need to do something and it because to be done immediately, so it seems basically impossible to have any sort of reasonable discussion if things seem so dire to you that this seems self-ev
196.
▲
by
saghm
1mo ago
Not only that but it's not always clear that friends don't already know! It's entirely possible their friends might have assumed that they already were aware and had been diagnosed.
197.
▲
by
saghm
1mo ago
That's what they mean by begging the question; you don't really get much useful information from trying to cite something as evidence of what you've already assumed.
198.
▲
by
saghm
1mo ago
Mine is actually all letters, it's G U L L I B L E. If you're having trouble remembering, I heard it's written on your ceiling right above you.
199.
▲
by
saghm
1mo ago
My favorite story of just how little people who aren't as tech savvy don't differentiate between different parts of the browser UI (which naturally leads to clicking things that are best left unclicked) is when my grandmother told
200.
▲
by
saghm
1mo ago
Literally the first two features listed on the website are "clean design" and "global menus". If they're too early to even have mockups of what that's going to look like, I have to question why they have what c
201.
▲
by
saghm
1mo ago
I'm in my early 30s, and I walked to and from school fairly often growing up in a suburb. My wife is the same age and living in one of the largest cities in the country used to ride the subway to and from school, but basically had the
202.
▲
by
saghm
1mo ago
I was responding to the framing of the parent comment that suggested "missles", which already essentially ignored that pronunciation.
203.
▲
by
saghm
1mo ago
> Conversations like this are a dead end. You can't devise a phonetic spelling convention without using a phonetic alphabet. I don't disagree with the latter point, but the former doesn't make sense to me; unless you'
204.
▲
by
saghm
1mo ago
I think they pronounce them non-phonetically, and I'm not really sure what's confusing about that. Pronunciation differing from spelling is literally what it means to say something isn't phonetic; if I accepted the spelling o
205.
▲
by
saghm
1mo ago
I took a chance and enabled JS on the site (the "chance" being it might just be disappointing), but I agree, that's wild!
206.
▲
by
saghm
1mo ago
> | have no idea how people are supposed to be productive with non-semantic rainbow vomit themes that are so popular in modern editors. I'm too ADHD to want to be overly stimulated by useless information. At least personally, I'
207.
▲
by
saghm
1mo ago
I'd argue that "le" is not really phonetic to how people pronounce words ending in that; "missils" would be more phonetic
208.
▲
by
saghm
1mo ago
At this point it's believable to me that Anthropic might not even be aware of what features get added in a given release. It's hard to tell the difference between "they actively are against documenting all of the defaults the
209.
▲
by
saghm
1mo ago
The responsibility to ask is literally the point of Chesterton's fence in my mind; when something looks out of place, and you think it doesn't make sense, you need to ask and learn about it. Sometimes the fence genuinely is unnece
210.
▲
by
saghm
1mo ago
Anyone who is looking for a job in the future would probably benefit from knowing what to look for (and what not to look for). I'm not likely to ever be in a position where I have outsized influence on the culture of the company I wo
More ›