3 ms·
If the worst thing you can say about a git hosting provider is that the performance of their blog is worse than the performance of their git servers, I think th
by saghm 1mo ago
If the worst thing you can say about a git hosting provider is that the performance of their blog is worse than the performance of their git servers, I think they're probably doing an okay job.
- steveklabnik 1mo agoWhile this is true, we do care about performance tremendously, and the animation not having good performance cuts against that, so I think it's a very fair criticism. Paying attention to details matters.
- saghm 1mo agoThat's reasonable. I mostly just found the framing to be unfair rather than the criticism itself; it feels kind of disingenuous to try to draw a connection between performance of git and performance of a webpage IMO
- pwdisswordfishq 1mo ago> the worst thing you can say about a git hosting provider is that the performance of their blog is worse than the performance of their git servers No one has agreed to this premise. You have invented it out of nowhere.
- saghm 1mo agoI'd argue that you invented some sort of link between "performance of git" and "performance of websites" that is not at all a premise I accept either, so it's not that unreasonable for me to point out that I think it's silly.