saaaaaam

4 ms·

31.
by saaaaaam 1mo ago
FWIW I enjoyed your articles. You write very clearly.
32.
by saaaaaam 1mo ago
As a neutral participant I think “the hostility” is probably because of your condescending tone when you said “hopefully it helps your confusion”. Your initial article really didn’t say anything about people being re-incarcerated for these
33.
by saaaaaam 1mo ago
I think the confusion is probably coming from the fact that the one reference to people being potentially re-incarcerated is buried right down the story. > Harkins said that since last October, she has seen 30-40 people ordered back into
34.
by saaaaaam 1mo ago
I have never seen a Pelican on X which used to be called twitter in about 1872. Keep up!
35.
by saaaaaam 1mo ago
When AGI comes it will come as a pelican and gobble up all these troublesome little fishies who gripe and whine and moan about pelicans.
36.
by saaaaaam 1mo ago
Good grief. You’re no fun either. This whole thread is lots of no fun. Pelicans are fun.
37.
by saaaaaam 1mo ago
Well you’re just no fun are you?!
38.
by saaaaaam 1mo ago
Pelicans please
39.
by saaaaaam 1mo ago
You can opt out.
40.
by saaaaaam 1mo ago
This is a hugely misleading editorialised title. The page title is "Can I opt out of my input or output data being used for training". Right at the top of the page it says "In certain cases, your input and output data (such a
41.
by saaaaaam 1mo ago
Hello Felix. Can you say why my additional usage credits have suddenly vanished? [edit] only asking here as last time I raised a support request it took six weeks before anyone responded.
42.
by saaaaaam 1mo ago
What do you mean by “considering how much we take from the public domain”?
43.
by saaaaaam 1mo ago
Yes they do. As a kid our (admittedly not particularly lavish) family summer holiday was paid for each year by the modest royalties my father, an academic, received from a couple of academic textbooks he had authored.
44.
by saaaaaam 1mo ago
Yes, that’s correct. There are people who make money directly from the copyright on the patterns. The parent commenter means that the people referenced are selling the patterns, not the garments.
45.
by saaaaaam 1mo ago
One of the things that I think a lot of people get confused about is "writing" vs proper written communication of ideas. HN is full of people posting AI-generated copy-paste "writing" about whatever it is they've bu
46.
by saaaaaam 1mo ago
A somewhat misleading article or at least headline as this is about households which will not account for people paying for AI subscriptions at work unless they are using their own personal card.
47.
by saaaaaam 1mo ago
This is all very well. But what about insulting your office?!
48.
by saaaaaam 2mo ago
I’m glad I’m not the only one who found this amusing!
49.
by saaaaaam 2mo ago
Eye-bleeding Claudeslopped is this week’s best expression of AI frustration.
50.
by saaaaaam 2mo ago
Haha! Well done for putting in the effort to find those. I was sure I’d seen it more than once but didn’t want to overrreach!
51.
by saaaaaam 2mo ago
Pretty sure someone else also promoted Claude to make something like this and posted it a few weeks back.
52.
by saaaaaam 2mo ago
I am not that familiar with her but had no idea she is Brazilian. I assumed she was German.
53.
by saaaaaam 2mo ago
I don’t find AI drama prose interesting to read, I find it exhausting and annoying. But as you say, each to their own.
54.
by saaaaaam 2mo ago
Because it’s nonsensical chewing gum. I just read the whole thing to see if I was missing something but it’s not changed my opinion. You have to plough through so much dramatic garbage to get to the actual message. I’m glad you enjoyed it,
55.
by saaaaaam 2mo ago
I don’t feel hoodwinked. There’s just zero point in letting AI write stuff like this because it’s such egregious bullshit. If you want to write something, write it. If you want AI to parade something for you, what are you actually looking f
56.
by saaaaaam 2mo ago
I was going to say “is it just vibe coded conspiracy bullshit” but the “no snark” rule held me back. I’m glad we came to the same conclusion, you just expressed it better ;)
57.
by saaaaaam 2mo ago
Only if that writing style is “incoherent bullshit”. From the article: “It talked itself into helping me by checking whether it should. So it does have some sort of soul. I said that out loud, to an empty room.” What?!
58.
by saaaaaam 2mo ago
I read the first few paragraphs and the stench of AI made me stop. Each to his or her own.
59.
by saaaaaam 2mo ago
So much breathless AI verbiage on the page and yet I still can’t work out what this is meant to do.
60.
by saaaaaam 2mo ago
Artisanal human slop took time - hours, days, weeks - and some effort to produce. AI slop can be produced in seconds, minutes or hours, at the click of a button.

More ›