saaaaaam

5 ms·

61.
by saaaaaam 2mo ago
In that case sadly I think it’s just having significant discipline to track the various things. I had to do this for a while because of allergies and it was a lot of effort. However, as someone else has suggested, either getting someone to
62.
by saaaaaam 2mo ago
The hilarious thing is that midway through reading this article a full screen (mobile) ad popped up which was some bullshit “influencer” style short form video ad.
63.
by saaaaaam 2mo ago
What do you need to track? Are you trying to track something like ten different things or just one or two?
64.
by saaaaaam 2mo ago
What?!
65.
by saaaaaam 2mo ago
This feels like a near daily occurrence.
66.
by saaaaaam 2mo ago
Presumably because the publisher takes the manuscript and does all the formatting and so on.
67.
by saaaaaam 2mo ago
> How this was written: drafted with an AI assistant from my own notes, then edited by me. Genuinely confused by this. All the AI tics and patterns that you left in there - did you genuinely think they improved the piece somehow? There w
68.
by saaaaaam 2mo ago
>Lots of public statements which are obviously false, and you would think the politician knows they are false, but utter them anyway because they also know lot of their supporters buy what they are saying anyway. Yes, we truly live in a
69.
by saaaaaam 2mo ago
Δημόσιοι υπάλληλοι
70.
by saaaaaam 2mo ago
Your koi pond contains rainwater that ran off my roof, down my gutters and through my flowerbed. You owe me £100. Do not pass go.
71.
by saaaaaam 2mo ago
Good fight / entirely thankless fight maybe. I can’t help feeling like this is the last gasp of the old internet. Those tiny corners of expertise can so easily be eliminated through a few months of “AI! SHINY!” and there’s no coming ba
72.
by saaaaaam 2mo ago
Can water even be nationalised? Do you own the rain that falls on my roof? Can you charge me money if I use it to water my garden?
73.
by saaaaaam 2mo ago
I think so, yes. When I make API calls, the discussion with itself is part of my token cost, so I assume that is the same in the subscription plans. Which is why people are surprised when they use their whole allocation in half an hour aski
74.
by saaaaaam 2mo ago
That’s quite encouraging to hear, because it aligns with what we are trying to do. Which is basically weather the AI storm and come out the other side with something that is essentially purely human. And then we might - where appropriate -
75.
by saaaaaam 2mo ago
Maybe she skips the main on every other lunch?
76.
by saaaaaam 2mo ago
The most lunches I’ve ever eaten in a day was 7.
77.
by saaaaaam 2mo ago
You’re paying…
78.
by saaaaaam 2mo ago
I see your rdio and raise you BOINC https://www.hypebot.com/digital-music-startup-beyond-oblivia...
79.
by saaaaaam 2mo ago
Yes, exactly, yes.
80.
by saaaaaam 2mo ago
What does “take into public ownership” even mean? Etc.
81.
by saaaaaam 2mo ago
Lawyer here.[0] Definitely possible.[1] [0] not a lawyer [1] what does “nationalise” even mean?
82.
by saaaaaam 2mo ago
I’m inherently skeptical of big walls of text like this these days. (So here’s a big wall of text of my own!) However, a lot of what is written here makes sense. And particularly “if your comprehension level stops [here] you get 'big w
83.
by saaaaaam 2mo ago
Gird your loins for a cease and desist from Sirius XM for trademark infringement. The satellite radio operator Sirius XM owns the internet radio on demand operator Pandora which owns the Rdio trademark, having bought Rdio the defunct stream
84.
by saaaaaam 2mo ago
>it feels like reading an impression of a literature book by a high school English class’s most overconfident student who’s only ever read LinkedIn-speak. Claude is very much the “stupid person’s idea of an intelligent person”[0] which,
85.
by saaaaaam 2mo ago
> I usually think of it in terms of having a "good" or "bad" session. In a bad session, there is a harmful bias that you can only get rid of through a new session. For example, if you exposed too much context about, s
86.
by saaaaaam 2mo ago
Oh, that's interesting - because that's absolutely what's happening in my experience. If I look at the thinking (which seems to have become unavailable in Opus 5 a lot of the time, but was present - and often useful - in 4.8&
87.
by saaaaaam 2mo ago
> Of course, it also has no concept of what context the user has and assumes that it must be the same it holds in its memory, which creates this “I didn’t know that you didn’t know” type of communication. Yes, this is a repeated problem
88.
by saaaaaam 2mo ago
Can you explain what “one of the easiest ways to demonstrate model collapse” means, please? I think you mean “if it can’t understand its own output this demonstrates model collapse” but I’m not entirely sure what “model collapse” means in
89.
by saaaaaam 2mo ago
I feel like it’s got significantly worse since opus 4.6 - to the point that it’s almost unusable now for a lot of what I do, which is predominantly textual analysis of documents (“explain this clause and its intersection with this other cla
90.
by saaaaaam 2mo ago
Genuinely thought you meant you carry out deepfake voice phishing.

More ›