sDlEzAtyoNAz

6 ms·

1.
by sDlEzAtyoNAz 7y ago
You say fantasy, surveys say thing that happens hundreds of thousands of times per year in the US. I think I'll believe the surveys on this matter.
2.
by sDlEzAtyoNAz 7y ago
One of those mysteries in life. https://i.ytimg.com/vi/HX4KKkSKZAY/maxresdefault.jpg
3.
by sDlEzAtyoNAz 7y ago
Why would you expect people to want to open their own wallet to pay for your pregnancy-related medical expenses in exchange for premiums that are much smaller than the expenses you already know you're going to incur?
4.
by sDlEzAtyoNAz 7y ago
It's not really intriguing when you consider that non-hispanic whites are the most likely to own firearms, and that that group's size has been essentially stagnant for the past few decades and is currently in decline.
5.
by sDlEzAtyoNAz 7y ago
And the better chances that one will be used intentionally to protect a productive and decent member of society from a violent criminal.
6.
by sDlEzAtyoNAz 7y ago
Do non-familial adoptions actually happen in any sort of significant numbers in central american countries?
7.
by sDlEzAtyoNAz 8y ago
As who says? And what reason do they have to believe it?
8.
by sDlEzAtyoNAz 8y ago
What reason do you have to believe that?
9.
by sDlEzAtyoNAz 8y ago
I wonder if people that belong to other civilizations see it the same way as you, and what the consequences would be for your civilization if people in yours did and people in other civilizations did not.
10.
by sDlEzAtyoNAz 8y ago
Sorry, implement what?
11.
by sDlEzAtyoNAz 8y ago
I think you did not read the link you posted in your comment here https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18825281 , because that is what I was quoting.
12.
by sDlEzAtyoNAz 8y ago
What is there to acknowledge other than your claim that the elites inside and out of government are historically right wing, except for a few brief periods of time? The bit about Nixon being a left-wing president? I don't care about yo
13.
by sDlEzAtyoNAz 8y ago
Which of those addresses the question I specifically asked, about their use of government assistance when raising their chidlren? It looks like you kinda-sorta skimmed over my question, it reminded you of some other question you heard someo
14.
by sDlEzAtyoNAz 8y ago
Do you think that they do all have equal potential? If so, at what point in the evolution of the human species was the first "equal potential" baby born? Or do chimpanzees and toads and bacteria have equal potential to human babie
15.
by sDlEzAtyoNAz 8y ago
Source? Preferably broken down by the visa type they used to come in (or lack thereof). The article is explicitly suggesting easing restrictions on immigration of low-wage laborers to help with housework, not doctors and engineers.
16.
by sDlEzAtyoNAz 8y ago
>I'm not really sure what to say. You could start with answering the questions that I asked.
17.
by sDlEzAtyoNAz 8y ago
You've ignored the examples I gave of policies where the right wing has clearly lost ground, and in doing so have missed my point. I'm not claiming the right wing has lost ground everywhere. I'm suggesting the right wing has
18.
by sDlEzAtyoNAz 8y ago
You're claiming the leadership of both parties are right wing, and elites inside and outside of government are right wing. Why, then, has the right wing lost so much ground on those issues I listed over the past 50-100 years? Do you de
19.
by sDlEzAtyoNAz 8y ago
>If one were to ask "what kind of coverage might we expect from a paper controlled by a billionaire industrialist?", we might actually predict a right-wing perspective. That depends on what he's selling, and also on what h
20.
by sDlEzAtyoNAz 8y ago
>Well, except for Hillary's email server. Or the fact that she was the Secretary of State while her husband's charity was accepting millions of dollars in donations from leaders of foreign countries (the very same people who th
21.
by sDlEzAtyoNAz 8y ago
Because they are more closely aligned with the populist wing of the Republican party than the neo-conservative/elitist/globalist wing of the Republican party. The elitist wing has been the dominant force in the Republican party fo
22.
by sDlEzAtyoNAz 8y ago
How do you explain the policies where the right wing has been steadily losing ground for the past 50-100 years? For example on immigration, on gender equality, or sexual liberation? Are the elites just losing those battles? Because it doesn
23.
by sDlEzAtyoNAz 8y ago
By having a financial stake in things other than the paper.
24.
by sDlEzAtyoNAz 8y ago
>but if just assumed that from the start I definitely wouldn't have gone out canvassing and trying to convince other people that their votes matter. Why not? If you can sway the decisions of large numbers of people, that sounds like
25.
by sDlEzAtyoNAz 8y ago
>and if you are a member of that group, and they paid X dollars to target that group with an attempt at disenfranchising them then we arrive at an estimated cost of $(X/population of group) to target you (among the others in the gro
26.
by sDlEzAtyoNAz 8y ago
>well what better way to make sure a large number of people don't vote than to let them convince themselves that voting doesn't matter. Sure, if you can convince large numbers of people of the validity of that argument, you cou
27.
by sDlEzAtyoNAz 8y ago
>the more likely it that your vote is important given the political capital and effort expended to make sure it is hard for that person to vote It would make no sense for voter suppression to be aimed at an individual. It would only make
28.
by sDlEzAtyoNAz 8y ago
One of those things deals with your own personal vote, which is not likely to change the outcome of the election, while the other deals with large numbers of votes, which could easily change the outcome of the election. No person trying to
29.
by sDlEzAtyoNAz 8y ago
>If you are correct and you vote, nothing happens. Or you get into a car accident, or just waste some time and energy getting to the polling station, or waste a stamp if voting by mail. >If you are wrong but you vote, you help make ch
30.
by sDlEzAtyoNAz 8y ago
>despite having 500 years for Catholicism to settle in, is still really big into the extended family. And? The people running the catholic church around 1000 AD were not running the catholic church in Latin America in 1500 AD.

More ›