s73ver_

56 ms·

601.
by s73ver_ 9y ago
""We advocate that everyone leans towards releasing and reverting. It is better to revert small changes than to spend time perfecting code. While this might rub some people the wrong way, we believe that the best way to learn is b
602.
by s73ver_ 9y ago
Most people are told to apply anyway, because most employers are setting the requirements ridiculously too high.
603.
by s73ver_ 9y ago
No, it's an asinine policy that screams "We only hire guys right out of college with no other life." It's the kind of thing that only comes up with people who have never been in such a situation, and can't imagine t
604.
by s73ver_ 9y ago
A throwaway comment on a website and the thing that is your first impression to a hiring manager are two completely different things.
605.
by s73ver_ 9y ago
I fail to see what's good about your approach. I suppose if your company has a lot of pointless bullshit that doesn't apply to the actual problem, then yeah, you're selecting for people who either are willing or have no other
606.
by s73ver_ 9y ago
And what's the problem?
607.
by s73ver_ 9y ago
Well, if it's any consolation, right now all their college football programs suck, and suck hard.
608.
by s73ver_ 9y ago
Not everyone wants to build a business.
609.
by s73ver_ 9y ago
"So if I take time off to watch our child while my wife rebuilds her career, and maybe move to a different career myself, somehow I'm penalized? Pardon my language, but fuck that." Agreed. Anyone who wants to implement some k
610.
by s73ver_ 9y ago
To be perfectly honest, I can't see proofreading your resume to be that big of a burden. And if you can't bother to do that, what else can't you bother to do while on the job?
611.
by s73ver_ 9y ago
Then keep the watermark. But don't feel that just because you're poor that their costs are any different.
612.
by s73ver_ 9y ago
Your situation certainly sucks, but I still have bills to pay. I still have to pay for hosting and content creation and all that. If you can't afford to pay the price I ask, well, then you shouldn't get it. Like anything else in t
613.
by s73ver_ 9y ago
BTC processors don't have that problem because they do absolutely no fraud detection. That's a pretty big no-go for most consumers.
614.
by s73ver_ 9y ago
Except these red herring concerns are the exact same fake concerns that those who are interested in suppressing voters come out with.
615.
by s73ver_ 9y ago
All of it. Proof that it happens on such a scale as to actually be a problem, and proof that those measures you speak of are not just thinly veiled attempts to disenfranchise voters. If you're going to mess with the people's right
616.
by s73ver_ 9y ago
You're gonna have to provide proof of that.
617.
by s73ver_ 9y ago
Again, proof. Show it, or stop disrespecting us by parroting the tired and debunked talking point.
618.
by s73ver_ 9y ago
Again, prove that you could do this on a scale large enough to actually affect an election without drawing any attention.
619.
by s73ver_ 9y ago
No, you were asked first. How would you do it without getting caught? How would you amass that amount of funding, and that number of people, and keep it all quiet?
620.
by s73ver_ 9y ago
And how are you going to do this on a large scale? Especially without being caught?
621.
by s73ver_ 9y ago
Both. There has been absolutely no evidence that it is any kind of a risk. Despite all of that information being out there, you still need actual people to go in and do the voting, and in large numbers at that. The amounts of money, and the
622.
by s73ver_ 9y ago
Show any evidence whatsoever that the type of voter fraud you're talking about is a problem. Until then, the talking point is worthless.
623.
by s73ver_ 9y ago
The inaccuracy is a feature, not a bug.
624.
by s73ver_ 9y ago
But you're not. Your entire counter is non-sensical, and is nowhere even close to being reality.
625.
by s73ver_ 9y ago
HN is quite heavily moderated. Should they not have the right to do so?
626.
by s73ver_ 9y ago
I'm sorry, but I can't get behind the idea that you're entitled to an account on a private company's site. Are they obligated to protect accounts for shitposters, to the detriment of everyone else's experience? Nobo
627.
by s73ver_ 9y ago
It takes 5 minutes to call your congressperson. Don't give me this "Too busy" garbage.
628.
by s73ver_ 9y ago
Can you call your congressperson? Congratulations, you can lobby.
629.
by s73ver_ 9y ago
Having a monopoly lands you generally have a lot of funding, with which to hire lawyers to challenge that. And bribe ALEC.
630.
by s73ver_ 9y ago
Yeah, they've been around for a while. They rely on people not really knowing anything about them to operate. Kudos for you on finding out.

More ›