s73ver_

34 ms·

361.
by s73ver_ 9y ago
I'm sorry, but their post is still bullshit. It is incredibly easy to not harass and to not assault people. Claiming that things are "tricky" or "unclear" when they're not doesn't help anyone.
362.
by s73ver_ 9y ago
This isn't an ad hominem. You're saying that these things are hard, so what is it exactly that you find hard about it?
363.
by s73ver_ 9y ago
No, you come on. What is it, specifically, that you find difficult to not do, especially at the workplace?
364.
by s73ver_ 9y ago
Actually, it's very rarely complicated. 90% of those cases could be eliminated by simply asking the person before you go in to touch them.
365.
by s73ver_ 9y ago
I don't get what your point is. Are you saying that only those who abuse others know how to run companies?
366.
by s73ver_ 9y ago
I've lived in 3, and in all of them, there was exactly one cable/internet provider.
367.
by s73ver_ 9y ago
Why not both? Not to mention, there are areas of the country which absolutely could not support more than one provider. Why should they have to suffer non-neutral net?
368.
by s73ver_ 9y ago
60% of the country's CENSUS DISTRICTS. Not 60% of the US. If one person in that district has access to the provider, it counts as the whole district, even though that's likely not true.
369.
by s73ver_ 9y ago
Then what the hell are you going to do? The vast majority of Americans have one option for an ISP. So they're not going to have an alternative.
370.
by s73ver_ 9y ago
Which all are going to have the same fees on them.
371.
by s73ver_ 9y ago
Violent armed revolution?
372.
by s73ver_ 9y ago
I'd rather not hope and pray that they're able to do this. Plus, I know that in many parts of the country, they won't be interested.
373.
by s73ver_ 9y ago
If your ISP decides to do the same thing, where are you gonna go? The vast majority of Americans do not have significant choice when it comes to service providers.
374.
by s73ver_ 9y ago
They do. But that's not the question being asked. It is, should a hardware store be able to charge different prices for the same kind of shovel?
375.
by s73ver_ 9y ago
Many of those ISPs took government funds to pay for those networks.
376.
by s73ver_ 9y ago
Why should you get paid more because your users were streaming Netflix as opposed to doing anything else with the traffic? You, as a network provider, are already peering with other network providers, and so you're getting paid for (an
377.
by s73ver_ 9y ago
I honestly don't get your argument. You're saying that, because they didn't do it while they were under regulation, they're not going to do it in the future? If they're not going to do it, then why remove the regula
378.
by s73ver_ 9y ago
I live in Orange County, CA. I have access to literally one provider.
379.
by s73ver_ 9y ago
If we don't want those things to happen, why allow them at all? Why wait, when we can just say up front, "Those things are not allowed to happen."
380.
by s73ver_ 9y ago
Why on earth should whether you get those plans or not depend on whether Google Jesus has decided to show his face upon you?
381.
by s73ver_ 9y ago
Maybe, but it would be absolute folly to allow neutrality at layer 3 to be lost just to prove a point.
382.
by s73ver_ 9y ago
So again, you're of the opinion that unwanted physical contact from your superior is not a problem?
383.
by s73ver_ 9y ago
So, to you, unwanted touching from a superior is not a problem?
384.
by s73ver_ 9y ago
"I'm making a point that innocent until proven guilty does not hold true anymore." I'm not seeing anyone thrown in jail just because of these accusations.
385.
by s73ver_ 9y ago
At the same time, we cannot excuse his behavior just because he does stuff we like.
386.
by s73ver_ 9y ago
"It subjects the internet to content regulation at the whims of the FCC." Explain, in detail, exactly how this is possible.
387.
by s73ver_ 9y ago
But, they don't. And there's also a large risk when taking a job, especially when one is recently graduated. I'm sorry, but I don't buy this idea that the business, the entity with all the power in the relationship, is e
388.
by s73ver_ 9y ago
The employee contacts the Americans with Disabilities Act? And beyond that, what guarantees that the EEOC is going to act, and that they'll find in your favor?
389.
by s73ver_ 9y ago
In those other cases, was the offering better than other companies in the area? Was there a compelling reason to choose that company over the others, and yet a majority of applicants still didn't show up to interviews?
390.
by s73ver_ 9y ago
That's a big ol' [Citation Needed]. You're gonna have to explain why you believe those two would be ineligible.

More ›