Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
s73ver
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
45 ms
·
421.
▲
by
s73ver
9y ago
Just finished it a few weeks ago. One of the better things it does, I think, is show how so many of the people and innovations were intertwined. In truth, getting all of that co-mingling and cross pollination among so many talented individu
422.
▲
by
s73ver
9y ago
Do they still have signs marking the places where historic things happened? Like the lab where the transistor was invented, or Claude Shannon's office?
423.
▲
by
s73ver
9y ago
I'd say it's much more influenced by one's gender or race.
424.
▲
by
s73ver
9y ago
"It will make people less socially inhibited, which means that tiny dickheads that normally have decent self-control will behave like big dickheads." Even at the offices I've worked at that were beer friendly, you'd find
425.
▲
by
s73ver
9y ago
In job adverts, "passion" is often shorthand for "willing to work unpaid overtime."
426.
▲
by
s73ver
9y ago
Auto video-blocking and tracking blocking built in is huge.
427.
▲
by
s73ver
9y ago
This is pure hyperbole. "Painful concessions," really?
428.
▲
by
s73ver
9y ago
No, it isn't. And I'm not doing a thing. They made the choice to do evil. They are the ones that made their life worse.
429.
▲
by
s73ver
9y ago
I honestly don't care. There are extremely few instances where that's actually the case. And it still doesn't excuse the fact that the job is evil.
430.
▲
by
s73ver
9y ago
People aren't. And unless we have business robots, there are still people involved.
431.
▲
by
s73ver
9y ago
They took an evil job. I'm fine with them getting a poor performance review.
432.
▲
by
s73ver
9y ago
Except when we're talking about other entities, they also have their own rights to free speech/free association. It's nice to say that free speech is a social virtue, but would you be willing to hold a Klan rally/BLM ral
433.
▲
by
s73ver
9y ago
This is pure evil, and I hope those doing it end up living under a bridge.
434.
▲
by
s73ver
9y ago
Isn't this just Gigster again?
435.
▲
by
s73ver
9y ago
Because that is Walmart shoving their costs onto the rest of us. I'm glad that the social safety net exists, but a company that requires the rest of us to pick up their slack quite frankly should not exist. If they are not capable of p
436.
▲
by
s73ver
9y ago
Walmart has not earned that benefit of the doubt. Given that it is Walmart, the default is to assume that it will be exploitative until proven otherwise.
437.
▲
by
s73ver
9y ago
Distribution center is different than in store associates.
438.
▲
by
s73ver
9y ago
It depends. Am I solving the problem of how to implement this feature in an effective and efficient manner? Or am I solving the problem of GOD DAMMIT WHY THE %^&# WON'T ANDROID STUDIO COMPILE NOW?!?!?
439.
▲
by
s73ver
9y ago
I think it depends on what we define as "problem solving". If we're talking about the problems that come with actually doing what you mean to do, sure. If we're talking about working around the problems with your softwar
440.
▲
by
s73ver
9y ago
Yeah, but does that really matter if, after you've joined, they start raising money and clam up about the terms?
441.
▲
by
s73ver
9y ago
If they've taken VC funding, they most likely are.
442.
▲
by
s73ver
9y ago
But there's also a much higher risk that your options will be dilluted to nothing.
443.
▲
by
s73ver
9y ago
But, there's a reason people post those things. Excluding the viral repost content for a second, people post their pictures and videos of what they're doing because they want to share it with people and have others see it.
444.
▲
by
s73ver
9y ago
I'd be willing to offer a different take: You life in a smaller-ish job market. I'd be willing to bet you have fewer of the hip, "bleeding edge" startups, and places that hop on the newest technologies right away. I'
445.
▲
by
s73ver
9y ago
If it means good ads, without tracking, without popovers/unders, basically without all the bullshit that most ads do now, it'd be a good thing. Content creators need to eat too, you know.
446.
▲
by
s73ver
9y ago
Because this isn't something to be debated. A person has the sole right to decide whether they are out or not. No one else. End of story.
447.
▲
by
s73ver
9y ago
I reject your premise entirely. And I reject any notion of the idea that anyone else, aside from the person in question, gets to make the decision on whether they're out or not. That is my final say in the matter.
448.
▲
by
s73ver
9y ago
His own chat logs show him ordering hits.
449.
▲
by
s73ver
9y ago
No, it's pretty clear that Ross himself ordered the hits. He did it of his own volition, and he is the sole person responsible for doing so.
450.
▲
by
s73ver
9y ago
No, it's not. He ordered the hits. He, himself, did it.
More ›