s73v3r_

16 ms·

121.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
That's a rather defeatist attitude to take.
122.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
"Would you really want to work for an organization that plays those sort of mind games?" I would like to work for an organization that pays me so I can buy food and pay rent.
123.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
The part where I had to do it twice for two different people isn't.
124.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
It was a joke. Except for the part where I had to do it twice.
125.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
And here I thought having to do FizzBuzz for two different interviewers was onerous.
126.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
I think it's extremely foolish to think that the SEC would have the ability to overrule the CIA/NSA/other TLA when it comes to disclosure of this.
127.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
It's possible, but it's much, much, much easier for an American company to hold another American company accountable when something like this happens. Instead of having to go through all those hoops, you sue the pants off the manu
128.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
"There were other considerations like the fact we were actually buing it from large reputable company and what happened was that some employees were doing it with no involvement of the company." I fail to see how that has anything
129.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
I know it's not popular around here, but have you considered getting traditional business loans from a bank?
130.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
So they have plenty of money not to have to choose.
131.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
Amazon is a trillion dollar company. They did not have to make any decision.
132.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
I cannot believe this would be the case.
133.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
No. You can expand the board.
134.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
Choosing not to do business with a company is NOT censorship. The only way you could believe it to be so is if you believe that the Daily Stormer has a right to speech, but no one else does.
135.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
Why is it unethical for me to do something for personal gain, but that sort of thing is what many companies are created to do?
136.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
Only if your employment agreement says so. Most people hired as programmers, yes, that's true. People who are hired as other things, and end up automating things, well, that's not so clear.
137.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
"If your company owns this is, what shouldn't they be rewarding you generously for making it?" Cause they have more power than you. That's about it.
138.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
" I think it is a bit short sighted, however, to worry that you will end up like the guy who automated his job and was then fired and replaced by a lower skilled guy - who cares, you SHOULD move on at that point if the company doesn&#x
139.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
Just because other people may have it worse is absolutely no reason to stop striving for better.
140.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
And why do you care? You're not doing worse than you were before.
141.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
Please do not insinuate that those of us who support higher minimum wages do not understand economics. It's extremely uncivil.
142.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
The government says they're pro business, but Trump himself is quite anti-Amazon (well, at least anti-Bezos, which extends itself to being somewhat anti-Amazon).
143.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
No, it's not. The Damore case is a textbook example of someone who thinks they're the smartest person in the room, and how "I can't be bigoted/misogynistic, cause science!" despite the fact that much of the quo
144.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
I'm not being hyperbolic. And if they are unable to do their jobs, that is quite dangerous, because then we will no longer have revenues to operate as a country.
145.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
That sounds like what was tried under the Articles of Confederation, and it didn't turn out well.
146.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
There is nothing unconstitutional about income taxes.
147.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
The article is about the IRS being dangerously underfunded.
148.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
That danger does exist, but I do not believe what are anywhere near that point, given how dramatically underfunded they are.
149.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
While that's true, if they're not enforcing the law, they can't deter tax evasion.
150.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
I don't see why a private beach is needed at all. Provide your premium services all you want; find other ways to only provide them to your guests.

More ›